...
首页> 外文期刊>Calcified tissue international. >Comparison of monthly ibandronate versus weekly risedronate in preference, convenience, and bone turnover markers in Korean postmenopausal osteoporotic women.
【24h】

Comparison of monthly ibandronate versus weekly risedronate in preference, convenience, and bone turnover markers in Korean postmenopausal osteoporotic women.

机译:在韩国绝经后骨质疏松症妇女中,伊班膦酸月度与每周利塞膦酸盐在偏好,便利性和骨转换指标方面的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Patient preferences, convenience, and bone turnover markers were evaluated for the monthly ibandronate over the weekly risedronate regimen in Korean postmenopausal osteoporotic women. This was a 6-month, prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter study with a two-period and two-sequence crossover treatment design. After a 30-day screening period, eligible participants with postmenopausal osteoporosis were randomized to receive either monthly oral ibandronate 150 mg for 3 months followed by weekly oral risedronate 35 mg for 12 weeks (sequence A) or the same regimen in reverse order (sequence B). Patient preference and convenience were evaluated by questionnaire. The changes in serum C-telopeptide after 3 months of treatment were analyzed. A total of 365 patients were enrolled in this study (sequence A 182, sequence B 183). Of patients expressing a preference (83.4%), 74.8% preferred the monthly ibandronate regimen over the weekly regimen (25.2%). More women stated that the monthly ibandronate regimen was more convenient (84.2%) than the weekly regimen (15.8%). There was no significant difference in the change in bone turnover marker between the two treatments. The two regimens were similarly tolerable. There were fewer adverse events in the monthly ibandronate group compared to the weekly risedronate group in terms of gastrointestinal side effects (nausea and abdominal distension). This study revealed a strong preference and convenience for monthly ibandronate over weekly risedronate in Korean postmenopausal osteoporotic women. There was no significant difference in change of bone turnover marker and safety profile between the two regimens.
机译:在朝鲜绝经后骨质疏松症妇女中,对伊班膦酸每月伊班膦酸治疗方案和每周利塞膦酸盐治疗方案的患者喜好,便利性和骨转换指标进行了评估。这是一项为期6个月的前瞻性,随机,开放标签,多中心研究,采用了两个周期和两个序列的交叉治疗设计。经过30天的筛查期后,将符合条件的绝经后骨质疏松症患者随机分为两组,分别接受每月口服伊班膦酸150 mg治疗3个月,然后每周接受35 mg瑞斯膦酸钠12周治疗(序列A)或以相同的方法接受相反的治疗(序列B) )。通过问卷调查评估患者的偏好和便利性。分析治疗3个月后血清C-端肽的变化。共有365位患者参加了这项研究(序列A 182,序列B 183)。在表现出偏爱的患者中(83.4%),有74.8%的患者倾向于每月使用伊班膦酸方案,而不是每周方案(25.2%)。越来越多的女性表示,每月伊班膦酸治疗方案比每周治疗方案(15.8%)更方便(84.2%)。两种治疗之间骨转换标记的变化无显着差异。两种方案的耐受性相似。就胃肠道副作用(恶心和腹胀)而言,伊班膦酸每月组的不良事件少于每周利塞膦酸盐组。这项研究表明,在韩国绝经后骨质疏松症妇女中,伊班膦酸钠每月优于每周利塞膦酸钠的使用更为方便。两种方案之间的骨转换标志物和安全性变化无明显差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号