...
首页> 外文期刊>GeoJournal >Key barriers to community cohesion: Views from residents of 20 London deprived neighbourhoods
【24h】

Key barriers to community cohesion: Views from residents of 20 London deprived neighbourhoods

机译:社区凝聚力的主要障碍:伦敦20个贫困地区居民的看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The notion of community has been central to the political project of renewal of New Labour in the UK. The paper explores how the discourses of community are framed within New Labour and discusses these in the light of the results from research which focuses on how people within urban deprived areas construct their community. It draws upon the results of one part of a larger research project (the 'Well London' programme) which aimed to capture the views of residents from 20 disadvantaged neighbourhoods throughout London using an innovative qualitative method known as the 'World Café'. Our results show the centrality of young people to the development of cohesive communities, the importance of building informal relationships between residents alongside encouraging greater participation to policy making, and the need to see these places as fragile and temporary locations but with considerable social strengths. Government policies are only partially addressing these issues. They pay greater attention to formally encouraging citizens to become more involved in policy making, largely ignore the contribution young people could make to the community cohesion agenda, and weakly define the shared norms and values that are crucial in building cohesive communities. Thus, the conclusion is that whilst an emphasis of the government on 'community' is to be welcome, more needs to be done in terms of considering the 'voices' of the community as well as enabling communities to determine and act upon their priorities.
机译:社区概念一直是英国“新劳动”更新的政治项目的核心。本文探讨了“新劳动”中社区话语的框架,并根据研究结果对这些话题进行了讨论,研究的重点是城市贫困地区的人们如何构建社区。它借鉴了一项更大的研究项目(“ Well London”计划)的一部分结果,该项目旨在使用一种称为“世界咖啡馆”的创新性定性方法,来捕捉整个伦敦20个弱势社区居民的看法。我们的结果表明,年轻人在凝聚社区的发展中处于中心地位;在居民之间建立非正式关系的重要性以及鼓励更大程度地参与政策制定的重要性;以及需要将这些地方视为脆弱而临时的地方,但具有相当大的社会优势。政府政策仅部分解决了这些问题。他们更加重视形式上的鼓励公民更多地参与政策制定工作,很大程度上忽略了年轻人可能对社区凝聚力议程做出的贡献,并弱化了对于建立凝聚力社区至关重要的共同规范和价值观。因此,结论是,尽管欢迎政府强调“社区”,但在考虑社区的“声音”以及使社区能够确定优先事项并采取行动方面,还需要做更多的工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号