首页> 外文期刊>Best practice & research:Clinical endocrinology & metabolism >Screening for hyperglycaemia in pregnancy: Consensus and controversy.
【24h】

Screening for hyperglycaemia in pregnancy: Consensus and controversy.

机译:筛查妊娠期高血糖:共识和争议。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Policy decisions on whether to implement screening programmes depend on whether the proposed programmes meet a set of criteria laid down by the World Health Organization. Screening for hyperglycaemia in pregnancy (HGP) does not meet all the criteria. However the case for screening has been strengthened by a number of recent developments, including: rising prevalence of HGP because of increasing maternal age and BMI; the results of the Hyperglycaemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes study, showing that adverse effects of HGP are seen over a wider range of plasma glucose levels than previously thought; two large trials which showed the benefits of treating lesser degrees of HGP; trials showing that metformin and glibenclamide were effective and safe alternatives to immediate insulin in those without good control on lifestyle measures alone. However uncertainties remain around the threshold for treatment, and on the best screening strategy.
机译:是否实施筛查计划的政策决定取决于拟议的计划是否符合世界卫生组织制定的一系列标准。妊娠期高血糖(HGP)筛查不符合所有标准。但是,最近的一些进展加强了筛查的力度,其中包括:由于产妇年龄和BMI的增加,HGP的患病率上升;高血糖和不良妊娠结局研究的结果表明,在比以前认为的更广泛的血糖水平范围内,可以看到HGP的不良反应;两项大型试验显示了治疗较小程度的HGP的益处;一项试验表明,二甲双胍和格列本脲在不能很好地控制生活方式的人群中是即时胰岛素的有效替代方案。但是,不确定性仍然在治疗的门槛附近,并且是最佳筛查策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号