...
首页> 外文期刊>Ear and hearing. >Optimal hearing aid use: Focus groups with hearing aid clients and audiologists
【24h】

Optimal hearing aid use: Focus groups with hearing aid clients and audiologists

机译:最佳使用助听器:与助听器客户和听力学家的焦点小组

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES:: This study explored the meaning and determinants of optimal hearing aid use from the perspectives of hearing aid clients and audiologists. An additional objective was to contrast the perspectives of the clients and audiologists. DESIGN:: Four focus groups were conducted: (1) clients (n = 7) in Denmark, (2) clients (n = 10) in the United Kingdom, (3) audiologists (n = 6) in Denmark, and (4) audiologists (n = 7) in the United Kingdom. Clients owned hearing aids and audiologists had regular contact with clients. The focus group facilitators used a topic guide to generate the participants' views on optimal hearing aid use. The focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, translated into English if conducted in Danish, and qualitatively analyzed with content analysis. RESULTS:: Both clients and audiologists described optimal hearing aid use as being frequent and regular and driven by the individual needs of the clients. When describing determinants of optimal hearing aid use, both clients and audiologists mentioned the role of the client (e.g., adjustment to hearing aids), the role of the audiologist (e.g., audiologic practice and profession), and the role of the hearing aid (e.g., benefits and limitations of the hearing aid). They both highlighted the importance of client access to information. However, how clients and audiologists described the influence of these determinants varied somewhat. Clients emphasized the role of the hearing aid in achieving optimal hearing aid use. From a client perspective, hearing aids that performed well and had relevant features were most central. In contrast, audiologists emphasized the role of a good client-audiologist relationship in achieving optimal hearing aid use. From the audiologist's perspective, audiologists who were able to understand the needs of the clients and to instruct clients appropriately were most central. CONCLUSIONS:: This study highlights similarities and differences in how clients and audiologists describe optimal hearing aid use and its determinants. It is commendable that audiologists acknowledge the importance of the client-audiologist relationship, but given clients' focus on hearing aids, audiologists might wish to describe more explicitly to their clients how their intervention can extend beyond provision of the optimal hearing aid.
机译:目的::本研究从助听器客户和听力学家的角度探讨了最佳助听器使用的含义和决定因素。另一个目标是对比客户和听力学家的观点。设计::进行了四个焦点小组讨论:(1)丹麦的客户(n = 7),(2)英国的客户(n = 10),(3)丹麦的听力学家(n = 6),以及(4 )英国的听力学家(n = 7)。客户拥有的助听器和听力学家与客户保持定期联系。焦点小组主持人使用了主题指南来产生参与者对最佳助听器使用的看法。对重点小组进行录音,逐字记录,如果使用丹麦语进行翻译,则将其翻译成英文,并通过内容分析进行定性分析。结果::客户和听力学家都将最佳助听器使用描述为经常性和有规律性的,并由客户的个人需求决定。在描述最佳助听器使用的决定因素时,服务对象和听力学家都提到了服务对象的角色(例如,对助听器的调整),听力学家的角色(例如,听力学实践和专业)以及助听器的角色(例如助听器的好处和局限性)。他们都强调了客户访问信息的重要性。但是,客户和听力学家描述这些决定因素影响的方式有所不同。客户强调了助听器在实现最佳助听器使用中的作用。从客户的角度来看,性能良好且具有相关功能的助听器最为重要。相比之下,听力学家则强调了良好的客户与听觉专家关系在实现最佳助听器使用中的作用。从听觉学家的角度来看,能够理解客户需求并适当地指导客户的听力学家最为重要。结论:本研究突出了客户和听力学家在描述最佳助听器使用及其决定因素方面的异同。值得称赞的是,听力学家承认了客户与听力专家之间关系的重要性,但是鉴于客户专注于助听器,听力学家们可能希望向其客户更明确地描述他们的干预方式可以如何超越提供最佳助听器的范围。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号