首页> 外文期刊>Ear and hearing. >The effect of hearing aid signal-processing schemes on acceptable noise levels: Perception and prediction
【24h】

The effect of hearing aid signal-processing schemes on acceptable noise levels: Perception and prediction

机译:助听器信号处理方案对可接受的噪声水平的影响:感知和预测

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: The acceptable noise level (ANL) test determines the maximum noise level that an individual is willing to accept while listening to speech. The first objective of the present study was to systematically investigate the effect of wide dynamic range compression processing (WDRC), and its combined effect with digital noise reduction (DNR) and directional processing (DIR), on ANL. Because ANL represents the lowest signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) that a listener is willing to accept, the second objective was to examine whether the hearing aid output SNR could predict aided ANL across different combinations of hearing aid signal-processing schemes. DESIGN:: Twenty-five adults with sensorineural hearing loss participated in the study. ANL was measured monaurally in two unaided and seven aided conditions, in which the status of the hearing aid processing schemes (enabled or disabled) and the location of noise (front or rear) were manipulated. The hearing aid output SNR was measured for each listener in each condition using a phase-inversion technique. The aided ANL was predicted by unaided ANL and hearing aid output SNR, under the assumption that the lowest acceptable SNR at the listener's eardrum is a constant across different ANL test conditions. RESULTS:: Study results revealed that, on average, WDRC increased (worsened) ANL by 1.5 dB, while DNR and DIR decreased (improved) ANL by 1.1 and 2.8 dB, respectively. Because the effects of WDRC and DNR on ANL were opposite in direction but similar in magnitude, the ANL of linear/DNR-off was not significantly different from that of WDRC/DNR-on. The results further indicated that the pattern of ANL change across different aided conditions was consistent with the pattern of hearing aid output SNR change created by processing schemes. CONCLUSIONS:: Compared with linear processing, WDRC creates a noisier sound image and makes listeners less willing to accept noise. However, this negative effect on noise acceptance can be offset by DNR, regardless of microphone mode. The hearing aid output SNR derived using the phase-inversion technique can predict aided ANL across different combinations of signal-processing schemes. These results suggest a close relationship between aided ANL, signal-processing scheme, and hearing aid output SNR.
机译:目标:可接受的噪声级(ANL)测试确定个人在听语音时愿意接受的最大噪声级。本研究的第一个目标是系统地研究宽动态范围压缩处理(WDRC)的效果,以及其与数字降噪(DNR)和定向处理(DIR)的组合效果对ANL的影响。因为ANL代表了听众愿意接受的最低信噪比(SNR),所以第二个目标是检查助听器输出SNR是否可以在助听器信号处理方案的不同组合中预测辅助ANL。设计:: 25名具有感音神经性听力损失的成年人参加了该研究。在两个独立和七个辅助条件下对ANL进行单项测量,在该条件下,对助听器处理方案的状态(启用或禁用)和噪声的位置(前后)进行了控制。使用相位反转技术,在每种情况下为每个收听者测量了助听器输出SNR。辅助ANL是通过独立的ANL和助听器输出SNR来预测的,前提是在不同ANL测试条件下,收听者耳膜的最低可接受SNR是一个常数。结果:研究结果表明,WDRC平均将ANL增加(恶化)1.5 dB,而DNR和DIR分别将ANL减少(改善)1.1和2.8 dB。由于WDRC和DNR对ANL的作用方向相反但幅度相似,因此,线性/ DNR-off的ANL与WDRC / DNR-on的ANL并无显着差异。结果进一步表明,不同助听条件下ANL的变化模式与处理方案创建的助听器输出SNR的变化模式一致。结论:与线性处理相比,WDRC产生了更嘈杂的声像,并使听众不太愿意接受噪声。但是,不管麦克风模式如何,DNR都可以抵消这种对噪声接受的负面影响。使用相位反转技术得出的助听器输出SNR可以在信号处理方案的不同组合中预测辅助ANL。这些结果表明辅助ANL,信号处理方案和助听器输出SNR之间存在密切关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号