...
首页> 外文期刊>Gut: Journal of the British Society of Gastroenterology >Individualised therapy is more cost-effective than dose intensification in patients with Crohn's disease who lose response to anti-TNF treatment: A randomised, controlled trial
【24h】

Individualised therapy is more cost-effective than dose intensification in patients with Crohn's disease who lose response to anti-TNF treatment: A randomised, controlled trial

机译:对于抗TNF治疗无效的克罗恩病患者,个体化治疗比加大剂量治疗更具成本效益:一项随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: Although the reasons for secondary loss of response to infliximab (IFX) maintenance therapy in Crohn's disease vary, dose intensification is usually recommended. This study investigated the cost-effectiveness of interventions defined by an algorithm designed to identify specific reasons for therapeutic failure. Design: Randomised, controlled, single-blind, multicentre study. 69 patients with secondary IFX failure were randomised to IFX dose intensification (5 mg/kg every 4 weeks) (n=36) or interventions based on serum IFX and IFX antibody levels using the proposed algorithm (n=33). Predefined co-primary end points at week 12 were proportion of patients responding (Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) decrease ≥70, or ≥50% reduction in active fistulas) and accumulated costs related to treatment of Crohn's disease, expressed as mean cost per patient, based on the Danish National Patient Registry for all hospitalisation and outpatient costs in the Danish healthcare sector. Results: Costs for intention-to-treat patients were substantially lower (34%) for those treated in accordance with the algorithm than by IFX dose intensification: ?6038 vs ?9178, p<0.001. However, disease control, as judged by response rates, was similar: 58% and 53%, respectively, p=0.81; difference 5% (-19% to 28%). For per-protocol patients, treatment costs were even lower (56%) in the algorithm-treated group (?4062 vs ?9178, p<0.001) and with similar response rates (47% vs 53%, p=0.78; difference -5% (-33% to 22%)). Conclusions: Treatment of secondary IFX failure using an algorithm based on combined IFX and IFX antibody measurements significantly reduces average treatment costs per patient compared with routine IFX dose escalation and without any apparent negative effect on clinical efficacy. Trial Registration No: NCT00851565.
机译:目的:尽管在克罗恩病中因英夫利昔单抗(IFX)维持治疗导致继发性反应丧失的原因各不相同,但通常建议加大剂量。这项研究调查了由旨在确定治疗失败的特定原因的算法定义的干预措施的成本效益。设计:随机,对照,单盲,多中心研究。将69名继发性IFX衰竭的患者随机分配至IFX剂量强化治疗(每4周5 mg / kg)(n = 36)或使用建议的算法基于血清IFX和IFX抗体水平进行干预(n = 33)。在第12周时,预先定义的主要共同终点是缓解的患者比例(克罗恩病活动指数(CDAI)降低≥70,或活动性瘘管降低≥50%)和与克罗恩病治疗相关的累积费用,表示为每位患者的平均费用患者,根据丹麦国家患者登记系统,计算丹麦医疗保健部门的所有住院和门诊费用。结果:与通过IFX剂量强化治疗相比,按照该算法治疗的意向治疗患者的费用大大降低(34%):? 6038 vs?9178,p <0.001。然而,根据反应率判断,疾病控制相似:分别为58%和53%,p = 0.81;相差5%(-19%至28%)。对于按协议治疗的患者,采用算法治疗的组的治疗费用更低(56%)(?4062 vs?9178,p <0.001),并且有相似的缓解率(47%vs 53%,p = 0.78);差异- 5%(-33%至22%))。结论:与常规IFX剂量递增相比,使用基于IFX和IFX抗体联合测量的算法治疗继发性IFX失败可显着降低每位患者的平均治疗成本,并且对临床疗效无明显负面影响。试用注册号:NCT00851565。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号