...
首页> 外文期刊>Family practice. >'I've broken my neck or something!' The general practice experience of whiplash.
【24h】

'I've broken my neck or something!' The general practice experience of whiplash.

机译:“我已经摔断了脖子!”鞭打的一般实践经验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To explore the experiences of patients and GPs concerning the management of mild to moderate whiplash. METHODS: Qualitative study using phenomenology. In-depth interviews with patients and their treating GPs. General practices in the northern suburbs of Perth, Western Australia. Participants. Maximum variation sample of nine patients suffering from mild to moderate whiplash and their treating GPs. GPs identified patients with recent whiplash. In-depth interviews were conducted with both groups. Patients were telephoned 3 months later to evaluate progress. Analysis used a constant comparative process and independent transcript review assisted by N-Vivo software. RESULTS: Patients articulated a need to be understood by a physician whom they knew and trusted. For all, the principal underlying concerns were about pain and the financial and physical impact of the injury, particularly in view of its perceived potential to harm the spine. While most patients expected medical interventions to help facilitate speedy recovery, physicians were far more pessimistic. Despite acknowledging the importance of addressing psychological needs, most GPs underestimated the degree of patient distress in the post-injury period. Although guardedly supportive of the local insurance system, GPs were scornful of patients seeking inappropriate compensation. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight the influence of the patient-doctor relationship on clinical care in patients with whiplash, suggesting that the path to patient recovery and physician satisfaction may benefit if clinicians better understand patient experiences. The disconnect between patient and practitioner conceptualization of the problem challenges quality patient-centred care.
机译:目的:探讨患者和全科医生治疗轻度至中度鞭打的经验。方法:使用现象学进行定性研究。对患者及其治疗GP的深入访谈。西澳大利亚州珀斯北郊的常规做法。参加者9名轻度至中度鞭打患者及其治疗GP的最大变异样本。全科医生确定了最近出现鞭打的患者。两组均进行了深入访谈。 3个月后给患者打电话以评估进展。分析使用了恒定的比较过程,并在N-Vivo软件的辅助下进行了独立的成绩单审查。结果:患者明确表示需要由他们认识和信任的医生理解。总体而言,最主要的潜在问题是疼痛以及损伤的财务和物理影响,尤其是考虑到其潜在伤害脊柱的潜力。尽管大多数患者希望通过医疗干预来促进康复,但医生却更加悲观。尽管认识到解决心理需求的重要性,但大多数全科医生低估了受伤后患者的痛苦程度。尽管谨慎地支持当地的保险制度,但全科医生对接受不适当赔偿的患者表示嘲笑。结论:研究结果突出了鞭打患者中医患关系对临床护理的影响,这表明如果临床医生更好地了解患者的经历,则患者康复和医师满意度的途径可能会受益。患者和医生对问题的概念化之间的脱节对以患者为中心的优质护理提出了挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号