首页> 外文期刊>Family practice. >In a recent editorial, Miriam Santer highlights what little we know about quality of life and patient satisfaction following treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding. She points in particular to the paucity of relevant data comparing the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS or Mirena~R) with other medical treatments. Therefore, we agree that the recommended ranking in recent NICE guidelines, suggesting Mirena coil as the first option for heavy menstrual bleeding, seems premature,
【24h】

In a recent editorial, Miriam Santer highlights what little we know about quality of life and patient satisfaction following treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding. She points in particular to the paucity of relevant data comparing the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS or Mirena~R) with other medical treatments. Therefore, we agree that the recommended ranking in recent NICE guidelines, suggesting Mirena coil as the first option for heavy menstrual bleeding, seems premature,

机译:在最近的社论中,米里亚姆·桑特(Miriam Santer)强调了我们对经期大出血治疗后的生活质量和患者满意度知之甚少。她特别指出,将左炔诺孕酮释放子宫内系统(LNG-IUS或Mirena〜R)与其他药物进行比较的相关数据很少。因此,我们同意,在最近的NICE指南中建议的排名似乎已经过早,这表明Mirena线圈是月经大量出血的首选,

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
机译:美国德克萨斯州休斯敦贝勒医学院医学伦理与健康政策中心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号