首页> 外文期刊>Contraception >Resources and procedures in the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) or hysterectomy in Brazil
【24h】

Resources and procedures in the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) or hysterectomy in Brazil

机译:在巴西使用左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统(LNG-IUS)或子宫切除术治疗重度月经出血的资源和程序

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is the most common complaint of women seeking gynecological care. Treatments included surgical or medical options including hysterectomy and the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) due to the profound suppression of endometrial growth that intrauterine LNG exerts which results in amenorrhea or in a reduction of blood loss. Objective: The study was conducted to evaluate the resources and procedures involved in inserting an LNG-IUS compared to performing hysterectomy in women with HMB in a public sector hospital in Brazil. Study design: Two cohorts of women were studied: women who accepted an LNG-IUS (n=124) and matched women who underwent hysterectomy on the same day (n=122). We evaluate the number of procedures carried out in each group of women, including those performed before the decision was made to insert an LNG-IUS or to perform hysterectomy, the insertion of the device itself and the surgical procedure, in addition to the procedures and complications registered up to 1 year after LNG-IUS insertion or hysterectomy. Results: Age and the duration of HMB were significantly lower in the LNG-IUS acceptors than women at the hysterectomy group. The numbers of gynecological consultations and Pap smears were similar in both groups; however, women in the hysterectomy group also underwent laboratory tests, ultrasonography, chest X-ray and electrocardiogram. In the hysterectomy group, the main complications were hemorrhage (six), bladder/bowel perforation (four), complications with anesthesia (one), ureteral reimplantation required (one) and abdominal pain (two). At 1 year, HMB was controlled in 83.1% of women in the LNG-IUS group, and 106 women continued with the device. Conclusions: Both treatments were effective in HMB control. Fewer resources and complications were observed in LNG-IUS acceptors when compared to hysterectomy. The LNG-IUS represents a good strategy for reducing the number of hysterectomies and the resources required for women with HMB.
机译:背景:月经大出血(HMB)是寻求妇科护理的女性最常见的主诉。治疗包括外科手术或医疗选择,包括子宫切除术和左炔诺孕酮释放子宫内系统(LNG-IUS),这是由于子宫内LNG所施加的子宫内膜生长受到显着抑制而导致闭经或减少失血。目的:进行这项研究是为了评估与在巴西一家公共医院的HMB妇女行子宫切除术相比,插入LNG-IUS所涉及的资源和程序。研究设计:研究了两个队列的妇女:接受LNG-IUS的妇女(n = 124)和在同一天接受子宫切除术的妇女(n = 122)。我们评估了每组女性中进行的手术数量,包括在决定插入LNG-IUS或进行子宫切除术之前进行的手术,设备本身的插入以及外科手术的程序,以及LNG-IUS插入或子宫切除术后1年内出现并发症。结果:LNG-IUS接受者的年龄和HMB持续时间显着低于子宫切除术组的女性。两组的妇科会诊次数和子宫颈抹片检查的次数相似。但是,子宫切除术组的妇女也接受了实验室检查,超声检查,胸部X线检查和心电图检查。子宫切除术组的主要并发症为出血(六例),膀胱/肠穿孔(四例),麻醉并发症(一例),需要输尿管再植入(一例)和腹痛(二例)。在1年时,LNG-IUS组中83.1%的女性中有HMB被控制,并且有106名女性继续使用该设备。结论:两种治疗均有效控制HMB。与子宫切除术相比,LNG-IUS受体的资源和并发症更少。 LNG-IUS是减少子宫切除术和HMB妇女所需资源的良好策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号