首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology >Pharmacodynamics of milnacipran in young and elderly volunteers.
【24h】

Pharmacodynamics of milnacipran in young and elderly volunteers.

机译:米那普仑在年轻和老年志愿者中的药效学。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

AIMS: To investigate the pharmacodynamics of milnacipran in healthy young and elderly volunteers. METHODS: Randomized double-blind crossover designs were employed and a standardized psychometric battery was administered pre and post dose for both studies. In the first study 10 healthy young volunteers received milnacipran 12.5 mg, 25 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg as a single dose or matched placebo. The test battery was administered at baseline and at 1, 2, 4 and 6 h post dose. The second study compared the effects of milnacipran 75 mg (50 mg+25 mg) per day, amitriptyline 50 mg (25 mg+25 mg) per day and placebo for 3 days' dosing in healthy volunteers aged over 65 years. The test battery was administered at baseline and at 2, 10 and 24 h post dose. The psychometric battery included critical flicker fusion (CFF), choice reaction time (CRT), compensatory tracking (CTT) and tests of short-term memory (STM), subjective sedation (LARS) and subjective sleep (LSEQ). RESULTS: Milnacipran produced no significant dose related effects in the young volunteers. For the elderly, milnacipran significantly (P<0.05) raised CFF scores compared with placebo but had no significant effects on any of the other measures used. Amitriptyline, in contrast, significantly (P<0. 05) lowered CFF threshold, lengthened CRT and increased error on the CTT. On the subjective variables, LARS and LSEQ, amitriptyline increased ratings both of sedation and of difficulty in waking from sleep. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that milnacipran at single doses of up to 100 mg in healthy young volunteers is free from disruptive effects on cognitive function and psychomotor performance. In addition, milnacipran 75 mg (50+25 mg) appears to be free of negative effects on cognitive function in elderly volunteers, where it seemingly improves performance on CFF. In contrast, the tricyclic antidepressant amitriptyline, used here as a positive internal control, significantly impaired performance in the elderly on the majority of psychometric measures used in this study. This finding not only validated the sensitivity of this current test battery but also indicates the potential behavioural toxicity of amitriptyline in clinical use in the elderly.
机译:目的:研究米那普仑在健康的年轻和老年志愿者中的药效学。方法:采用随机双盲交叉设计,并在两次给药前和给药后均使用标准化的心理测验电池。在第一个研究中,有10名健康的年轻志愿者接受了米那普仑12.5 mg,25 mg,50 mg,100 mg单次剂量或匹配的安慰剂。在基线以及给药后1、2、4和6小时给予测试电池。第二项研究比较了65岁以上健康志愿者每天服用米那普仑75 mg(50 mg + 25 mg),阿米替林50 mg(25 mg + 25 mg)和安慰剂3天的剂量。在基线以及给药后2、10和24小时给予测试电池。心理电池包括临界闪烁融合(CFF),选择反应时间(CRT),代偿性追踪(CTT)和短期记忆测试(STM),主观镇静(LARS)和主观睡眠(LSEQ)。结果:在年轻志愿者中,米那普仑未产生明显的剂量相关作用。对于老年人,米那普仑与安慰剂相比显着(P <0.05)提高了CFF评分,但对其他任何使用的措施均无显着影响。相比之下,阿米替林显着降低(P <0。05)CFF阈值,延长CRT并增加CTT的误差。在主观变量LARS和LSEQ上,阿米替林增加了镇静和难以入睡的评分。结论:结果显示,在健康的年轻志愿者中,米那普仑单次剂量最高100毫克,对认知功能和精神运动能力没有破坏性影响。此外,米那普仑75 mg(50 + 25 mg)似乎对老年志愿者的认知功能没有负面影响,似乎可以改善CFF的表现。相比之下,三环抗抑郁阿米替林在这里用作阳性内部对照,在这项研究中使用的大多数心理测量方法中,老年人的表现明显受损。这一发现不仅证实了该电流测试电池的敏感性,而且表明了阿米替林在老年人临床使用中的潜在行为毒性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号