...
首页> 外文期刊>Family practice. >Parents and nurses during the immunization of children--where is the power? A conversation analysis.
【24h】

Parents and nurses during the immunization of children--where is the power? A conversation analysis.

机译:父母和护士在为儿童接种疫苗时-力量在哪里?对话分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Best practice for health care practitioners is considered patient-centred approaches which empower patients. Immunization of young children requires maintaining this approach while retaining professional management. OBJECTIVE: The objectives were to assess situations within the immunization event with discordance between health provider and caregiver and evaluate strategies used to empowering parents while obtaining the desired clinical outcome. METHODS: This was a qualitative study nested within a larger study of immunization rates in 124 randomly selected primary care practices. Interactions between immunizing practice nurses, caregivers and children were videotaped and transcribed and underwent conversation analysis. Six purposively sampled primary care practices in Auckland, New Zealand, served as the setting. The participants were eight practice nurses immunizing 10 children and their parents. Normative pattern of interactions and 'deviant cases' involving discordance between nurse andparent. RESULTS: A total of 168 minutes of video-recorded conversation from 10 immunization sessions provided strong 'typical' pattern and equally striking 'deviant cases'. Parents mostly treated nurses as 'experts' and accepted asymmetry of knowledge over medical matters. Nurses demonstrated skilful strategies in delineating their area of medical expertise from areas in which patients are expert-their knowledge of themselves and their children. CONCLUSION: While patient centredness and empowering patients are contemporary goals of primary health care delivery, these attributes are not precisely defined. Patients may wish to be informed, but many trust their health professionals to direct their decision making. Although health professionals may impart as much knowledge as they can, asymmetry of knowledge remains. However, patients hold expertise beyond their clinical situation in the social and economic world in which they live.
机译:背景:医疗保健从业人员的最佳实践被认为是赋予患者权力的以患者为中心的方法。对幼儿进行免疫需要在保持专业管理的同时保持这种方法。目的:目的是评估免疫接种事件中卫生提供者与护理人员之间的状况,并评估用于在获得期望的临床结果的同时赋予父母权力的策略。方法:这是一项定性研究,涉及124个随机选择的初级护理实践中较大的免疫接种率研究。对免疫接种的护士,护理人员和孩子之间的互动进行了录像和转录,并进行了对话分析。在新西兰奥克兰的六个有目的抽样的初级保健实践中作为背景。参加者是八名执业护士,为10名儿童及其父母进行了免疫接种。互动模式和涉及护士与父母之间不和谐的“异常案例”的规范模式。结果:来自10个免疫接种会议的总共168分钟的视频对话提供了强有力的“典型”模式和同样令人震惊的“异常案例”。父母大多视护士为“专家”,并接受有关医疗知识的不对称。护士展示了熟练的策略,可以从患者对自己和孩子的了解方面来区分他们的医学专业知识领域。结论:以患者为中心和赋予患者权力是初级医疗保健提供的当代目标,但这些属性并未得到精确定义。病人可能希望被告知,但是许多人相信他们的卫生专业人员可以指导他们的决策。尽管卫生专业人员可能会传播尽可能多的知识,但是知识的不对称性仍然存在。但是,患者所拥有的专业知识超出了他们所生活的社会和经济领域的临床状况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号