...
首页> 外文期刊>Global change biology >Few multiyear precipitation-reduction experiments find ashift in the productivity-precipitation relationship
【24h】

Few multiyear precipitation-reduction experiments find ashift in the productivity-precipitation relationship

机译:很少有多年减少降水的实验发现生产力与降水的关系发生了变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Well-defined productivity-precipitation relationships of ecosystems are needed as benchmarks for the validation of land models used for future projections. The productivity-precipitation relationship may be studied in two ways: the spatial approach relates differences in productivity to those in precipitation among sites along a precipitation gradient (the spatial fit, with a steeper slope); the temporal approach relates interannual productivity changes to variation in precipitation within sites (the temporal fits, with flatter slopes). Precipitation-reduction experiments in natural ecosystems represent a complement to the fits, because they can reduce precipitation below the natural range and are thus well suited to study potential effects of climate drying. Here, we analyse the effects of dry treatments in eleven multiyear precipitation-manipulation experiments, focusing on changes in the temporal fit. We expected that structural changes in the dry treatments would occur in some experiments, thereby reducing the intercept of the temporal fit and displacing the productivity-precipitation relationship downward the spatial fit. The majority of experiments (72%) showed that dry treatments did not alter the temporal fit. This implies that current temporal fits are to be preferred over the spatial fit to benchmark land-model projections of productivity under future climate within the precipitation ranges covered by the experiments. Moreover, in two experiments, the intercept of the temporal fit unexpectedly increased due to mechanisms that reduced either water loss or nutrient loss. The expected decrease of the intercept was observed in only one experiment, and only when distinguishing between the late and the early phases of the experiment. This implies that we currently do not know at which precipitation-reduction level or at which experimental duration structural changes will start to alter ecosystem productivity. Our study highlights the need for experiments with multiple, including more extreme, dry treatments, to identify the precipitation boundaries within which the current temporal fits remain valid.
机译:需要明确定义的生态系统生产力与降水的关系,作为验证用于未来预测的土地模型的基准。可以通过两种方式研究生产力与降水的关系:空间方法将生产力的差异与沿降水梯度(空间拟合,坡度较大)的站点之间的降水差异联系在一起;时间方法将年生产力变化与站点内降水的变化相关(时间拟合,坡度更平坦)。在自然生态系统中进行的减少降水的实验是对气候变化的补充,因为它们可以将降水减少到自然范围以下,因此非常适合研究气候干燥的潜在影响。在这里,我们分析了十一年多年降水操纵实验中干法处理的效果,重点是时间适应性的变化。我们期望在某些实验中会发生干法处理中的结构变化,从而减少时间拟合的截距并将生产力与降水的关系向空间拟合的下方移动。大多数实验(72%)表明,干法处理不会改变时间适应性。这意味着在实验覆盖的降水范围内,在未来气候下,当前的时间拟合要优于空间拟合,以作为基准土地模型预测生产率的基准。此外,在两个实验中,由于减少水分流失或养分流失的机制,时间拟合的截距出乎意料地增加了。仅在一个实验中,并且仅在区分实验的晚期和早期时,才观察到预期的截距减少。这意味着我们目前尚不知道在哪个减少降水的水平或在哪个实验持续时间结构变化会开始改变生态系统的生产力。我们的研究强调需要进行多种(包括更极端的)干法处理的实验,以识别当前时间拟合仍然有效的降水边界。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号