首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Functional Evaluation of Three Manure-Borne Indicator Bacteria Release Models with Multiyear Field Experiment Data
【2h】

Functional Evaluation of Three Manure-Borne Indicator Bacteria Release Models with Multiyear Field Experiment Data

机译:多年田间试验数据对三种粪便细菌释放模型的功能评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Modeling the fate and transport of Escherichia coli is of substantial interest because of how this organism serves as an indicator of fecal contamination in microbial water quality assessment. The efficacy of models used to assess the export of E. coli from agricultural fields is dependent, in part, on submodels they utilize to simulate E. coli release from land-applied manure and animal waste. Although several release submodels have been proposed, they have only been evaluated and compared with data from laboratory or small plot E. coli release experiments. Our objective was to evaluate and compare performances of three manure-borne bacteria release submodels at field-scale: exponential release (EM), two-parametric Bradford and Schijven (B-S), and two-parametric Vadas-Kleinman-Sharpley (VKS); each was independently incorporated and tested as a submodel within the export model KINEROS2/STWIR, using E. coli. Dairy manure was uniformly applied via surface broadcasting once a year for six consecutive years on a 0.28 ha experimental field site. Two irrigation events followed each application: the first immediately followed the initial application and the second occurred one week later. Manure and soil samples were collected before and after irrigation, respectively, and manure, soil, and edge-of-field runoff samples were analyzed for E. coli. Model performance was evaluated with the Akaike criterion, coefficients of determination (R2), and root mean squared errors (RMSE) values. The percentage of exported manure-borne E. coli varied from 0.1% to 10% in most cases, generally reflecting the lag time between initiation of irrigation and initiation ofedge-of-field runoff. The export model performed better when using the VKS submodel which was preferred in 55% of cases. The B-S and EM submodels were preferred in 27% and 18% of cases, respectively. Two-parametric submodels were ultimately preferred over the single parameter submodel.
机译:对大肠杆菌的命运和运输进行建模非常重要,因为这种微生物如何在微生物水质评估中用作粪便污染的指标。用于评估大肠杆菌从农业领域的出口的模型的有效性部分取决于它们用于模拟从土地施用的粪便和动物粪便中释放大肠杆菌的子模型。尽管已提出了几种释放子模型,但仅对它们进行了评估,并与实验室或小规模大肠杆菌释放实验的数据进行了比较。我们的目标是在田间规模上评估和比较三种肥料传播的细菌释放子模型的性能:指数释放(EM),两个参数的Bradford和Schijven(B-S)以及两个参数的Vadas-Kleinman-Sharpley(VKS);使用大肠杆菌,将它们各自独立整合并作为出口模型KINEROS2 / STWIR中的子模型进行测试。每年通过地面广播在0.28公顷的试验场地上连续六年均匀施用奶牛粪便。每次施用之后发生两次灌溉事件:第一次发生在首次施用之后,而第二次发生在一周后。分别在灌溉前后收集粪便和土壤样品,并对粪便,土壤和田间径流样品进行大肠杆菌分析。使用Akaike准则,确定系数(R 2 )和均方根误差(RMSE)值评估模型性能。在大多数情况下,出口的粪便传播的大肠杆菌的百分比从0.1%到10%不等,通常反映了开始灌溉和开始耕作径流之间的滞后时间。使用VKS子模型时,导出模型的性能更好,这在55%的情况下是首选。 B-S和EM子模型分别在27%和18%的情况下是首选的。最终,两参数子模型优于单参数子模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号