首页> 外文期刊>Global ecology and biogeography >How do different dispersal modes shape the species-area relationship? Evidence for between-group coherence in the Macaronesian flora
【24h】

How do different dispersal modes shape the species-area relationship? Evidence for between-group coherence in the Macaronesian flora

机译:不同的扩散方式如何塑造物种-面积关系? Macaronesian菌群中群体间一致性的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aim We explore the island speciesarea relationships (ISARs) of several plant groups differing in dispersal ability. We examine whether: (i) the ISAR slope is higher for less dispersive groups (diminishing from not-wind-dispersed seed plants to wind-dispersed seed plants, pteridophytes and bryophytes); and (ii) the regional richness is higher than that predicted by the ISAR of its constituent islands for groups with lower dispersal ability. Additionally, we relate both patterns to the compositional dissimilarity (beta diversity) between islands. Location The Macaronesian archipelagos of the Azores, Madeira and Canary Islands. Methods ISARs were estimated using the conventional power model. Differences in slopes among taxa were analysed through ANCOVA tests. We assessed the deviation of the total richness of the Macaronesian flora from that predicted by the ISAR and calculated several measures of beta diversity (turnover, nestedness-resultant dissimilarity and nestedness). Analyses were repeated after excluding the two Canarian islands of Lanzarote and Fuerteventura, which have unique climatic and geological conditions in the region. Results All ISAR models were significant except for pteridophytes (for which it was significant when excluding Lanzarote and Fuerteventura). ISAR slopes did not differ among taxa. Regional richness followed ISAR predictions for bryophytes and pteridophytes when Lanzarote and Fuerteventura were excluded, while the total number of Macaronesian seed plants (particularly not-wind-dispersed species) always fell above the ISAR. Turnover was higher in seed plants than in bryophytes and pteridophytes, and the opposite occurred with nestedness. Main conclusions Differences in dispersal ability influence the compositional dissimilarity between these islands, but not the rate of species increase with area. This may be because ISAR slopes are mostly determined by within-island processes of species accumulation, while differences in dispersal generate different between-island patterns. The lack of relationship between the ISAR slope and species replacement or nestedness prevents its use as a proxy for beta diversity.
机译:目的我们探索分散能力不同的几种植物群的岛种面积关系(ISAR)。我们检查是否:(i)散布较少的群体的ISAR斜率更高(从不风散的种子植物减少到风散的种子植物,蕨类植物和苔藓植物); (ii)对于分散能力较低的群体,其区域丰富度高于其组成岛屿的ISAR预测。此外,我们将两种模式都与岛之间的成分差异(β多样性)相关。地点亚速尔群岛,马德拉群岛和加那利群岛的马卡罗尼亚群岛。方法使用常规功率模型估算ISAR。通过ANCOVA测试分析了分类单元之间的坡度差异。我们评估了Macaronesian植物区系的总体丰富度与ISAR预测的差异,并计算了一些β多样性的度量标准(周转率,嵌套性-结果差异和嵌套性)。在排除了兰萨罗特岛和富埃特文图拉岛这两个具有独特气候和地质条件的加那利群岛之后,再次进行了分析。结果除蕨类植物外(除兰萨罗特和费埃特文图拉岛均显着),所有ISAR模型均具有显着性。 ISAR斜率在分类单元之间没有差异。排除兰萨罗特岛和富埃特文图拉岛后,区域丰富性遵循了ISAR对苔藓植物和蕨类植物的预测,而Macaronesian种子植物(特别是非风散种)的总数始终低于ISAR。种子植物的周转率高于苔藓植物和蕨类植物,而巢状则相反。主要结论分散能力的差异会影响这些岛屿之间的成分差异,但不会影响物种随面积的增加。这可能是因为ISAR坡度主要由物种积累的岛内过程决定,而分散的差异产生了不同的岛间格局。 ISAR斜率与物种替代或嵌套之间缺乏联系,因此无法将其用作β多样性的替代物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号