...
首页> 外文期刊>Biogeosciences >Carbon budgets for an irrigated intensively grazed dairy pasture and an unirrigated winter-grazed pasture
【24h】

Carbon budgets for an irrigated intensively grazed dairy pasture and an unirrigated winter-grazed pasture

机译:灌溉密集放牧的奶牛牧场和未灌溉的冬季放牧的牧场的碳预算

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Intensification of pastoral agriculture is occurring rapidly across New Zealand, including increasing use of irrigation and fertiliser application in some regions. While this enables greater gross primary production (GPP) and livestock grazing intensity, the consequences for the net ecosystem carbon budget (NECB) of the pastures are poorly known. Here, we determined the NECB over one year for an irrigated, fertilised and rotationally grazed dairy pasture and a neighbouring unirrigated, unfertilised, winter-grazed pasture. Primary terms in the NECB calculation were: net ecosystem production (NEP), biomass carbon removed by grazing cows and carbon (C) input from their excreta. Annual NEP was measured using the eddy-covariance method. Carbon removal was estimated with plate-meter measurements calibrated against biomass collections, pre- and post-grazing. Excreta deposition was calculated from animal feed intake. The intensively managed pasture gained C (NECBaEuro-aEuro parts per thousand= aEuro-103aEuro-+/- aEuro-42aEuro-g CaEuro-m(-2)aEuro-yr(-1)) but would have been subject to a non-significant C loss if cattle excreta had not been returned to the pasture. The unirrigated pasture was C-neutral (NECBaEuro-aEuro parts per thousand= aEuro-a'13aEuro-+/- aEuro-23aEuro-g CaEuro-m(-2)aEuro-yr(-1)). While annual GPP of the former was almost twice that of the latter (2679 vs. 1372aEuro-g CaEuro-m(-2)aEuro-yr(-1)), ecosystem respiration differed by only 68aEuro-% between the two pastures (2271 vs. 1352aEuro-g CaEuro-m(-2)aEuro-yr(-1)). The ratio of GPP to the total annual water input of the irrigated pasture was 37aEuro-% greater than that of the unirrigated pasture, i.e. the former used the water input more efficiently than the latter to produce biomass. The NECB results agree qualitatively with those from many other eddy-covariance studies of grazed grasslands, but they seem to be at odds with long-term carbon-stock studies of other New Zealand pastures.
机译:在新西兰,牧业农业集约化迅速发生,包括在某些地区增加灌溉和肥料的使用。尽管这可以提高初级生产总值(GPP)和牲畜放牧强度,但对于牧场的净生态系统碳预算(NECB)的后果却鲜为人知。在这里,我们确定了灌溉,施肥和轮转放牧的奶牛牧场和附近的未灌溉,未施肥的冬季放牧的牧场在一年内的NECB。 NECB计算中的主要术语是:生态系统净产量(NEP),放牧母牛清除的生物量碳和粪便排泄的碳(C)输入。使用涡度协方差法测量年度NEP。用针对生物量收集,放牧前和放牧后校准的平板仪表测量值估算除碳量。从动物采食量计算排泄物沉积。在集约化管理下,牧场获得C(NECBaEuro-aEuro千分之一= aEuro-103aEuro-+ /-aEuro-42aEuro-g CaEuro-m(-2)aEuro-yr(-1)),但受到非如果没有将牛排泄物放回牧场,则会造成大量的碳损失。未灌溉的牧场是C中性的(NECBaEuro-aEuro千分之一= aEuro-a'13aEuro-+ /-aEuro-23aEuro-g CaEuro-m(-2)aEuro-yr(-1))。前者的年度GPP几乎是后者的两倍(2679比1372aEuro-g CaEuro-m(-2)aEuro-yr(-1)),但两个牧场之间的生态系统呼吸仅相差68aEuro%。对比1352aEuro-g CaEuro-m(-2)aEuro-yr(-1))。 GPP与灌溉牧场年总水输入量的比率比未灌溉牧场高37aEuro-%,即前者比后者更有效地利用水输入来生产生物量。 NECB的结果与许多其他放牧草地的涡度-协方差研究的结果在质量上吻合,但似乎与其他新西兰牧场的长期碳储量研究不一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号