首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology >Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between the oral anti-influenza neuraminidase inhibitor prodrug oseltamivir and antacids.
【24h】

Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between the oral anti-influenza neuraminidase inhibitor prodrug oseltamivir and antacids.

机译:口服抗流感神经氨酸酶抑制剂前药奥司他韦和抗酸药之间缺乏药代动力学相互作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

AIMS: Oseltamivir is an oral ester prodrug of its active metabolite Ro 64-0802, a potent and selective neuraminidase inhibitor of the influenza virus. The object of this study was to evaluate whether the oral absorption of oseltamivir was reduced in the presence of two main classes of antacid, Maalox(R) suspension (containing magnesium hydroxide and aluminium hydroxide) and Titralac(R) tablets (containing calcium carbonate). METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers completed a randomized, single dose, three-period crossover study. Each volunteer received in a fasted state, 150 mg oseltamivir alone (Treatment A), 150 mg oseltamivir with a 20 ml Maalox(R) suspension (Treatment B), and 150 mg oseltamivir with four Titralac(R) tablets (Treatment C), with 7-10 days washout in between treatments. Plasma and urine concentrations of oseltamivir and Ro 64-0802 were measured using a validated h.p.l.c./MS/MS assay. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated for oseltamivir and Ro 64-0802. Since antacids are locally acting drugs and generally not expected to be absorbed substantially into the systemic system, no plasma or urine concentrations of antacids were measured. RESULTS: Bioequivalence was achieved for the primary pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax and AUC(0, infinity ) of Ro 64-0802 following administration of oseltamivir with either Maalox(R) suspension or Titralac(R) tablets vs administration of oseltamivir alone. The bioavailability (90% confidence intervals) of Ro 64-0802 following administration of oseltamivir together with Maalox(R) suspension vs administration of oseltamivir alone, was 90% (83.6, 96.9%) for Cmax and 94.1% (91.4, 96.9%) for AUC(0, infinity ); similarly, for Titralac(R) tablets, the equivalent values were 95.1% (88.3, 102%) for Cmax and 94.7% (91.9, 97.5%) for AUC(0, infinity ). CONCLUSIONS: The coadministration of either Maalox(R) suspension or Titralac(R) tablets with oseltamivir has no effect on the pharmacokinetics of either oseltamivir or Ro 64-0802, and conversely, there is no evidence that coadministration with oseltamivir has an effect on the safety and tolerability of either Maalox(R) suspension or Titralac(R) tablets. There was no pharmacokinetic interaction between oseltamivir with either antacid, demonstrating that the oral absorption of oseltamivir was not impaired in the presence of antacids containing magnesium, aluminium or calcium.
机译:目的:Oseltamivir是其活性代谢产物Ro 64-0802的口服酯类前药,Ro 64-0802是一种有效且选择性的流感病毒神经氨酸酶抑制剂。这项研究的目的是评估在两种主要抗酸剂,Maalox?悬浮液(含有氢氧化镁和氢氧化铝)和Titralac?片剂(含有碳酸钙)存在下是否降低了奥司他韦的口服吸收。 。方法:十二名健康志愿者完成了一项随机,单剂量,三期交叉研究。每位志愿者在禁食状态下分别接受150毫克奥司他韦(治疗A),150毫克奥司他韦和20毫升Maalox?混悬液(治疗B)和150毫克奥司他韦与四片Titralac®片剂(治疗C),在两次治疗之间需要7-10天的冲洗时间。使用经过验证的h.p.l.c./MS/MS测定法测定奥司他韦和Ro 64-0802的血浆和尿液浓度。计算了奥司他韦和Ro 64-0802的药代动力学参数。由于抗酸剂是局部作用的药物,通常不期望其被吸收到全身系统中,因此未测量血浆或尿液中抗酸剂的浓度。结果:与混悬液单独使用奥司他韦相比,将奥司他韦与混悬液或Titralac®一起给药后,Ro 64-0802的主要药代动力学参数Cmax和AUC(0,infinity)达到了生物等效性。与使用单独的奥司他韦相比,与使用单独的奥司他韦混悬液一起给药后,Ro 64-0802的Ro 64-0802的生物利用度为90%(83.6,96.9%)和94.1%(91.4,96.9%)对于AUC(0,infinity);类似地,对于Titralac片剂,Cmax的等效值为95.1%(88.3,102%),而AUC(0,infinity)的等效值为94.7%(91.9,97.5%)。结论:Maalox(R)混悬液或Titralac(R)片剂与oseltamivir并用对oseltamivir或Ro 64-0802的药代动力学没有影响,相反,没有证据表明与oseltamivir并用对悬浮液或Titralac片剂的安全性和耐受性。奥司他韦与任何一种抗酸药之间都没有药代动力学的相互作用,这表明在含有镁,铝或钙的抗酸药的存在下,奥司他韦的口服吸收不会受到损害。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号