首页> 外文期刊>Genetics in medicine >Tilting at windmills no longer: A data-driven discussion of DTC DNA ancestry tests
【24h】

Tilting at windmills no longer: A data-driven discussion of DTC DNA ancestry tests

机译:不再在风车上倾斜:DTC DNA血统测试的数据驱动讨论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: Discussions about direct-to-consumer (DTC) DNA ancestry tests have to date been based primarily on conjectures, speculation, and anecdotes, despite the industry being more than a decade old. Representative, empirical data on consumer characteristics; motivations and expectations for testing; intended uses for the information; understanding of results; and behavioral and psychological reactions to the tests are absent. Although the 2010 American Society of Human Genetics white paper clarifies the number and some general characteristics of companies marketing and selling DNA ancestry tests, additional data about the industry's practices have been unavailable. Methods: To promote a data-driven discussion of the DNA ancestry testing industry, we conducted a systematic investigation to identify companies selling DNA ancestry tests and conducted an empirical study of the industry's practices using data collected from each company's website. Results: Here, we present a wealth of data, including an updated directory of companies, marketing slogans, product types and names, range of prices, diversity of reporting and representing results, noted benefits and limitations of testing, and a host of website practices. Conclusion: The tremendous diversity of tests, information, and practices of companies in the DNA ancestry sector should be considered when policies for best practice guidelines or regulatory oversight are being developed.
机译:目的:迄今为止,关于消费类直接DNA(DTC)DNA血统测试的讨论主要基于推测,推测和轶事,尽管该行业已有十多年的历史了。有关消费者特征的代表性经验数据;测试的动机和期望;信息的预期用途;对结果的了解;并且没有对测试的行为和心理反应。尽管《 2010年美国人类遗传学会》白皮书阐明了营销和销售DNA血统测试的公司的数量和一些一般特征,但有关该行业实践的其他数据却无法获得。方法:为了促进对DNA血统测试行业的数据驱动讨论,我们进行了系统的调查,以识别销售DNA血统测试的公司,并使用从每个公司的网站收集的数据对行业实践进行了实证研究。结果:在这里,我们提供了大量数据,包括公司的更新目录,营销口号,产品类型和名称,价格范围,报告和表示结果的多样性,测试的好处和局限性以及许多网站实践。结论:在制定最佳实践指南或监管监督政策时,应考虑DNA血统领域公司的测试,信息和实践的多样性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号