首页> 外文期刊>Biogeosciences >An application of mathematical models to select the optimal alternative for an integral plan to desertification and erosion control (Chaco Area–Salta Province–Argentina)
【24h】

An application of mathematical models to select the optimal alternative for an integral plan to desertification and erosion control (Chaco Area–Salta Province–Argentina)

机译:应用数学模型为荒漠化和侵蚀控制整体计划选择最佳替代方案(查科地区–萨尔塔省–阿根廷)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Multi-criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) is concerned with identifying the values, uncertainties and other issues relevant in a given decision, its rationality, and the resulting optimal decision. These decisions are difficult because the complexity of the system or because of determining the optimal situation or behaviour. This work will illustrate how MCDA is applied in practice to a complex problem to resolve such us soil erosion and degradation. Desertification is a global problem and recently it has been studied in several forums as ONU that literally says: “Desertification has a very high incidence in the environmental and food security, socioeconomic stability and world sustained development”. Desertification is the soil quality loss and one of FAO’s most important preoccupations as hunger in the world is increasing. Multiple factors are involved of diverse nature related to: natural phenomena (water and wind erosion), human activities linked to soil and water management, and others not related to the former. In the whole world this problem exists, but its effects and solutions are different. It is necessary to take into account economical, environmental, cultural and sociological criteria. A multi-criteria model to select among different alternatives to prepare an integral plan to ameliorate or/and solve this problem in each area has been elaborated taking in account eight criteria and five alternatives. Six sub zones have been established following previous studies and in each one the initial matrix and weights have been defined to apply on different criteria. Three multicriteria decision methods have been used for the different sub zones: ELECTRE, PROMETHEE and AHP. The results show a high level of consistency among the three different multicriteria methods despite the complexity of the system studied. The methods are fully described for La Estrella sub zone, indicating election of weights, Initial Matrixes, algorithms used for PROMETHEE, and the Graph of Expert Choice showing the AHP results. A brief schema of the actions recommended for each of the six different sub zones is discussed.
机译:多标准决策分析(MCDA)涉及确定给定决策中的价值,不确定性和其他相关问题,其合理性以及由此产生的最优决策。由于系统的复杂性或确定最佳情况或行为,这些决定很困难。这项工作将说明MCDA如何在实践中应用于解决诸如土壤侵蚀和退化等复杂问题。荒漠化是一个全球性问题,最近在ONU的多个论坛上进行了研究,字面上说:“荒漠化在环境和粮食安全,社会经济稳定以及世界可持续发展中的发生率很高”。荒漠化是土壤质量的损失,是世界上饥饿加剧时粮农组织最重要的任务之一。涉及多种多样的自然因素涉及以下方面:自然现象(水和风蚀),与土壤和水管理相关的人类活动以及与前者无关的其他因素。全世界都存在这个问题,但是其影响和解决方案是不同的。必须考虑经济,环境,文化和社会学标准。在考虑了八个标准和五个备选方案的情况下,制定了一个多准则模型,以在不同的备选方案中进行选择,以准备一个整体计划来改善或解决每个领域的问题。在先前的研究之后,已经建立了六个分区,在每个分区中,初始矩阵和权重已定义为适用于不同的标准。三种不同的多标准决策方法已用于不同的分区:ELECTRE,PROMETHEE和AHP。结果表明,尽管所研究的系统很复杂,但三种不同的多准则方法之间却具有很高的一致性。对La Estrella子区域进行了详细说明,包括权重的选择,初始矩阵,用于PROMETHEE的算法以及显示AHP结果的专家选择图。讨论了为六个不同子区域中的每个子区域建议的操作的简短模式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号