...
首页> 外文期刊>Geomicrobiology journal >Interactions Between Fe(III)-Oxides and Fe(III)-Phyllosilicates During Microbial Reduction 1: Synthetic Sediments
【24h】

Interactions Between Fe(III)-Oxides and Fe(III)-Phyllosilicates During Microbial Reduction 1: Synthetic Sediments

机译:微生物还原过程中Fe(III)-氧化物与Fe(III)-苯基硅酸盐之间的相互作用1:合成沉积物

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Fe(III)-oxides and Fe(III)-bearing phyllosilicates are the two major iron sources utilized as electron acceptors by dissimilatory iron-reducing bacteria (DIRB) in anoxic soils and sediments. Although there have been many studies on microbial Fe(III)-oxide and Fe(III)-phyllosilicate reduction with both natural and specimen materials, no controlled experimental information is available on the interaction between these two phases when both are available for microbial reduction. In this study, the model DIRB Geobacter sulfurreducens was used to examine the pathways of Fe(III) reduction in Fe(III)-oxide stripped subsurface sediment that was coated with different amounts of synthetic high surface area (HSA) goethite. Cryogenic (12K) Fe-57 Mossbauer spectroscopy was used to determine changes in the relative abundances of Fe(III)-oxide, Fe(III)-phyllosilicate, and phyllosilicate-associated Fe(II) [Fe(II)-phyllosilicate] in bioreduced samples. Analogous Mossbauer analyses were performed on samples from abiotic Fe(II) sorption experiments in which sediments were exposed to a quantity of exogenous soluble Fe(II) (FeCl(2)2H(2)O) comparable to the amount of Fe(II) produced during microbial reduction. A Fe partitioning model was developed to analyze the fate of Fe(II) and assess the potential for abiotic Fe(II)-catalyzed reduction of Fe(III)-phyllosilicates. The microbial reduction experiments indicated that although reduction of Fe(III)-oxide accounted for virtually all of the observed bulk Fe(III) reduction activity, there was no significant abiotic electron transfer between oxide-derived Fe(II) and Fe(III)-phyllosilicatesilicates, with 26-87% of biogenic Fe(II) appearing as sorbed Fe(II) in the Fe(II)-phyllosilicate pool. In contrast, the abiotic Fe(II) sorption experiments showed that 41 and 24% of the added Fe(II) engaged in electron transfer to Fe(III)-phyllosilicate surfaces in synthetic goethite-coated and uncoated sediment. Differences in the rate of Fe(II) addition and system redox potential may account for the microbial and abiotic reaction systems. Our experiments provide new insight into pathways for Fe(III) reduction in mixed Fe(III)-oxide/Fe(III)-phyllosilicate assemblages, and provide key mechanistic insight for interpreting microbial reduction experiments and field data from complex natural soils and sediments.
机译:氧化铁(III)和含Fe(III)的层状硅酸盐是缺氧土壤和沉积物中的异化铁还原细菌(DIRB)用作电子受体的两个主要铁源。尽管已经有许多关于用天然和标本材料还原微生物的Fe(III)-氧化物和Fe(III)-页硅酸盐的研究,但当这两个相都可用于微生物还原时,没有关于这两个相之间相互作用的受控实验信息。在这项研究中,模型DIRB地球细菌减硫剂被用来检查Fe(III)氧化物剥离的地下沉积物中Fe(III)还原的途径,该沉积物中涂覆了不同数量的合成高表面积针铁矿。使用低温(12K)Fe-57 Mossbauer光谱法确定Fe(III)-氧化物,Fe(III)-页硅酸盐和与页硅酸盐相关的Fe(II)[Fe(II)-页硅酸盐]的相对丰度变化生物还原样品。对来自非生物Fe(II)吸附实验的样品进行了类似的Mossbauer分析,其中沉积物暴露于与Fe(II)数量相当的外源可溶性Fe(II)(FeCl(2)2H(2)O)微生物还原过程中产生的。建立了Fe分配模型以分析Fe(II)的命运,并评估非生物Fe(II)催化还原Fe(III)-页硅酸盐的潜力。微生物还原实验表明,尽管氧化铁(III)的还原几乎占据了观察到的全部铁(III)还原活性,但在氧化物衍生的铁(II)和铁(III)之间没有明显的非生物电子转移。 -页硅酸盐硅酸盐,其中有26-87%的生物源性Fe(II)出现在Fe(II)-页硅酸盐库中作为吸附的Fe(II)。相比之下,非生物对Fe(II)的吸附实验表明,在合成针铁矿包覆和未包覆的沉积物中,分别有41%和24%的Fe(II)参与电子转移到Fe(III)-页硅酸盐表面。 Fe(II)添加速度和系统氧化还原电势的差异可能是微生物和非生物反应系统的原因。我们的实验为混合Fe(III)-氧化物/ Fe(III)-页硅酸盐组合物中的Fe(III)还原途径提供了新的见识,并为解释微生物还原实验和来自复杂天然土壤和沉积物的现场数据提供了关键的力学见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号