...
首页> 外文期刊>Gait & posture >Reliability of COP-based postural sway measures and age-related differences.
【24h】

Reliability of COP-based postural sway measures and age-related differences.

机译:基于COP的姿势摇摆测量的可靠性以及与年龄相关的差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The objectives of this study were to assess the within-day and between-day reliability of several center of pressure (COP)-based measures of postural sway and identify whether there were age-related differences in reliability. Thirty-two healthy individuals (16 younger and 16 older) participated. COP was recorded during quiet upright stance on 4 different days, and a variety of measures determined: mean velocity, median power frequency, RMS distance, sway area, and two fractal measures derived from Hurst rescaled range analysis (HR/S) and detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and standard error of measurement (SEM) were used to quantify reliability. Mean velocity was the most reliable measure. DFA exponents had relatively better reliability than HR/S exponents. In general, within-day reliability was better than between-day. In comparison with younger participants, older participants exhibited better relative reliability (ICC) for all COP measures and comparable absolute reliability (SEM) except for mean velocity and sway area. These results may be useful in guiding the future selection and interpretation of COP-based measures.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估几种基于压力中心(COP)的姿势摇摆测量的日间和日间可靠性,并确定可靠性是否存在与年龄相关的差异。 32位健康人士(年龄在16岁以下,年龄在16岁以上)参加了此次活动。在4天的安静直立姿势期间记录COP,并确定了多种测量值:平均速度,中位功率频率,RMS距离,摇摆面积以及从Hurst重标范围分析(HR / S)和趋势下降的波动得出的两个分形测量值分析(DFA)。类内相关系数(ICC)和标准测量误差(SEM)用于量化可靠性。平均速度是最可靠的度量。 DFA指数比HR / S指数具有相对更好的可靠性。通常,日间可靠性要好于日间。与年轻的参与者相比,年长的参与者在所有COP测度上均表现出更好的相对可靠性(ICC),除了平均速度和摇摆面积外,其可比的绝对可靠性(SEM)也更高。这些结果可能有助于指导未来选择和解释基于COP的措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号