...
首页> 外文期刊>Gait & posture >A comparison of variability in spatiotemporal gait parameters between treadmill and overground walking conditions
【24h】

A comparison of variability in spatiotemporal gait parameters between treadmill and overground walking conditions

机译:跑步机与地面步行条件之间时空步态参数变化的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Motorized treadmills are commonly used in biomechanical and clinical studies of human walking. Whether treadmill walking induces identical motor responses to overground walking, however, is equivocal. The purpose of this study was to examine differences in the spatiotemporal gait parameters of the lower extremities and trunk during treadmill and overground walking using comparison of mean and variability values. Twenty healthy participants (age 23.8 +/- 1.2 years) walked for 6 min on a treadmill and overground while wearing APDM 6 Opal inertial monitors. Stride length, stride time, stride velocity, cadence, stance phase percentage, and peak sagittal and frontal plane trunk velocities were measured. Mean values were calculated for each parameter as well as estimates of short- (SD1) and long-term variability (SD2) using Poincare analyses. The mean, SD1, and SD2 values were compared between overground and treadmill walking conditions with paired t-tests (alpha = 0.05) and with effect size estimates using Cohen's d statistic. Mean values for each of the gait parameters were statistically equivalent between treadmill and overground walking (p > 0.05). The SD1 and SD2 values representing short-and long-term variability were considerably reduced (p < 0.05) on the treadmill as compared to overground walking. This demonstrates the importance of consideration of gait variability when using treadmills for research or clinical purposes. Treadmill training may induce invariant gait patterns, posing difficulty in translating locomotor skills gained on a treadmill to overground walking conditions. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:电动跑步机通常用于人体步行的生物力学和临床研究。然而,跑步机行走是否引起对地面行走的相同运动响应是模棱两可的。本研究的目的是通过比较均值和变异性值来检查跑步机和地面行走过程中下肢和躯干时空步态参数的差异。二十名健康参与者(年龄23.8 +/- 1.2岁)戴着APDM 6 Opal惯性监测仪在跑步机上和地面上行走了6分钟。测量步幅长度,步幅时间,步幅速度,节奏,步态相百分比以及矢状矢状和额平面躯干速度。使用Poincare分析计算每个参数的平均值以及短期(SD1)和长期变异性(SD2)的估计值。使用成对的t检验(α= 0.05)并使用Cohen d统计量估计效应大小,比较了地面和跑步机行走条件下的平均值,SD1和SD2值。在跑步机和地面行走之间,每个步态参数的平均值在统计学上均等(p> 0.05)。与地面行走相比,跑步机上的SD1和SD2值代表了短期和长期变化,已大大降低(p <0.05)。这证明了在将跑步机用于研究或临床目的时考虑步态变化的重要性。跑步机训练可能会导致步态变化,从而导致难以将跑步机上获得的运动技能转化为地面行走条件。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号