首页> 外文期刊>Geoderma: An International Journal of Soil Science >Validation requirements for diffuse reflectance soil characterization models with a case study of VNIR soil C prediction in Montana.
【24h】

Validation requirements for diffuse reflectance soil characterization models with a case study of VNIR soil C prediction in Montana.

机译:以蒙大拿州的VNIR土壤C预测为例,对漫反射土壤特征模型的验证要求。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There has been growing interest in the use of diffuse reflectance as a quick, inexpensive tool for soil characterization. Some studies, using techniques like Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression of 1st derivative spectra have reported predictive accuracies for soil Organic C (OC) and Inorganic C (IC) that approach the analytical limits of standard laboratory measures. We applied 1st derivative Visible and Near-Infrared (VNIR) reflectance PLS regression modeling to soil samples obtained from six sites with similar soils across three counties in north central Montana, with five completely random 30% test sets selected for model validation. We obtained-relative to estimated SEL (Standard Error of Laboratory reference measurements) of 1.07 and 0.97 g kg-1 for OC and IC, respectively-SECV (calibration Standard Error of Cross-Validation) values of 1.04-1.20 and 1.54-1.63 g kg-1, and SEP (validation Standard Error of Prediction) values of 1.09-1.27 and 1.43-1.63 g kg-1. These results, together with validation RPD (Residual Prediction Deviation) values >=2, could suggest a stable, effective PLS calibration that could be applied to similar soils in the same physiographic region. However, when we attempted to predict soil C for each of the six sites in turn using the remaining five sites for calibration, the models failed completely at two of the six sites and gave inconsistent results at a third site despite pre-screening for spectral similarity. "One-off" local calibrations for this study required ~20-35% of the full samples, which could be prohibitively expensive for many applications. The results of this study demonstrate that "pseudo-independent" validation (random selection of non-independent test samples) can overestimate predictive accuracy relative to independent validation. The spatial structure of calibration and validation samples matters a great deal. Greater care needs to be taken to ensure that validation samples are independent to a degree that matches intended model use..
机译:人们越来越关注使用漫反射作为一种快速,便宜的土壤表征工具。一些研究使用一阶导数光谱的偏最小二乘(PLS)回归等技术,报告了土壤有机碳(OC)和无机碳(IC)的预测精度,其接近标准实验室指标的分析极限。我们将一阶导数可见和近红外(VNIR)反射PLS回归模型应用于从蒙大拿州中北部三个县的六个具有相似土壤的地点获得的土壤样品,并选择了五个完全随机的30%测试集进行模型验证。我们获得了相对于OC和IC的估计SEL(实验室参考测量标准误差)1.07和0.97 g kg-1的相对值,SECV(交叉验证的校准标准误差)值分别为1.04-1.20和1.54-1.63 g kg-1和SEP(验证的标准预测误差)值分别为1.09-1.27和1.43-1.63 g kg-1。这些结果与验证的RPD(残差预测偏差)值> = 2一起,可能表明可以将稳定,有效的PLS校准应用于相同地理区域中的相似土壤。但是,当我们尝试使用剩余的五个位置进行校正以依次预测六个位置中的每个位置的土壤碳时,尽管预先筛选了光谱相似性,但模型在六个位置中的两个位置完全失败,并且在第三个位置给出的结果不一致。这项研究的“一次性”本地校准需要全部样品的约20-35%,对于许多应用而言,这可能过于昂贵。这项研究的结果表明,“伪独立”验证(非独立测试样本的随机选择)相对于独立验证可能高估了预测准确性。校准和验证样品的空间结构非常重要。需要格外小心,以确保验证样本在一定程度上独立于与预期模型使用相匹配的程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号