首页> 外文期刊>Geoderma: An International Journal of Soil Science >Comparing regression-based digital soil mapping and multiple-point geostatistics for the spatial extrapolation of soil data
【24h】

Comparing regression-based digital soil mapping and multiple-point geostatistics for the spatial extrapolation of soil data

机译:比较基于回归的数字土壤制图和多点地统计学用于土壤数据的空间外推

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this study, two approaches for spatial data extrapolation are investigated. The intention here is to predict at fine spatial resolution, total gamma radiometric counts across a large mapping extent (recipient site) on the basis of finely resolved information collected from a nearby donor site. The extrapolation methods used were a digital soil mapping (DSM) regression model approach and a multivariate multiple-point statistical (MPS) approach. Qualitative interpretation of the results from both extrapolation approaches across the recipient site in the Lower Hunter Valley, Australia (area 220 km(2)) shows promise in terms of highlighting known geochemical and physical variations of soils in this area. The extrapolated map was evaluated in a small portion of the study area (area 4 km2) where similar high-resolution gamma radiometric data were available. Results show comparable performance of both approaches where a root-mean-square error of 87 ppm was found. A concordance correlation coefficient value of 0.04 was found for the DSM approach, but higher for the MPS approach (0.16). Under the Homosoil framework, where soil point data and mapping are sparse, either method investigated in this study would be suitable as a 'first-cut' approach for developing a comprehensive soil information system in those areas. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:在这项研究中,研究了两种用于空间数据外推的方法。此处的目的是在良好的空间分辨率下,根据从附近施主站点收集到的精细信息,在较大的制图范围内(收件人站点)预测总的伽马辐射计数。所使用的外推方法是数字土壤测绘(DSM)回归模型方法和多元多点统计(MPS)方法。在澳大利亚下亨特河谷(面积220 km(2))内,对两种接受者所在地外推方法的结果进行定性解释,显示出该区域土壤的已知地球化学和物理变化方面的前景。在研究区域的一小部分(面积为4 km2)中评估了外推图,那里有类似的高分辨率伽马辐射数据。结果表明两种方法的性能相当,发现均方根误差为87 ppm。 DSM方法的一致性相关系数值为0.04,而MPS方法的一致性相关系数值为0.16。在稀疏土壤点数据和地图的Homosoil框架下,本研究中研究的任何一种方法都适合作为在这些地区开发综合土壤信息系统的“第一手”方法。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号