首页> 外文期刊>European addiction research >Intoxication, the law and criminal responsibility--a sparkling cocktail at times: the case studies of Canada and Germany.
【24h】

Intoxication, the law and criminal responsibility--a sparkling cocktail at times: the case studies of Canada and Germany.

机译:陶醉,法律和刑事责任-有时是波光粼粼的鸡尾酒:加拿大和德国的案例研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The combination of intoxication and criminal responsibility has been a problem field for legal theory and practice for quite some time. While it has been argued in certain contexts that intoxication reduces or denies criminal responsibility, elsewhere it has been reasoned that intoxicated offenders should be held as (or even more so) legally responsible as sober ones. But even in legal systems where the criminal responsibility of intoxicated offenders is emphasized, legal theory and practice are confronted with the challenge of converting such values into workable jurisprudence, since many intoxicated offenders naturally lack one of the key premises for responsibility for a criminal act, namely mens rea. This article compares the very different legal philosophies and practices that have evolved around the issue of intoxication and criminal responsibility in Canada and Germany. While the Canadian system has long and in a variety of ways tried to reconcile the inherent tensions between the principles of legal culpability and the intent to punish intoxicated offenders in material law, the German system has produced a set of legal tools that allow for a pragmatic and ends-oriented approach. This article concludes that the evolution and profile of these legal schemes is likely linked to the cultural status of alcohol and drinking in the respective system context.
机译:醉酒和刑事责任相结合已经成为法律理论和实践的一个问题领域。尽管在某些情况下认为醉酒会减轻或否认刑事责任,但在其他地方却有理由认为,醉酒的罪犯应被视为(甚至更应该是)清醒的法律责任人。但是,即使在强调醉酒罪犯的刑事责任的法律体系中,法律理论和实践也面临着将这种价值转化为可行的法学的挑战,因为许多醉酒罪犯自然缺乏承担刑事责任的关键前提之一,即男装。本文比较了加拿大和德国围绕醉酒和刑事责任问题演变而来的非常不同的法律哲学和实践。尽管加拿大体系长期以来以各种方式试图调和法律罪责原则与惩罚物质法中醉酒罪犯的意图之间的内在矛盾,但德国体系却产生了一套法律工具,可以采取务实的态度。和面向目标的方法。本文得出的结论是,这些法律计划的演变和概况很可能与各自制度背景下的酒精饮料文化地位有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号