首页> 外文期刊>Geochemical Journal >Monte Carlo comparison of conventional ternary diagrams with new log-ratio bivariate diagrams and an example of tectonic discrimination
【24h】

Monte Carlo comparison of conventional ternary diagrams with new log-ratio bivariate diagrams and an example of tectonic discrimination

机译:传统三元图与新对数比二元图的蒙特卡罗比较以及构造判别的示例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Monte Carlo simulation of large replications of 100,000 was used to evaluate the final total propagated error represented by standard deviation or percentage of relative standard deviation (%RSD) in conventional ternary diagrams, as well as in bivariate diagrams based on statistically coherent additive, centered, and isometric log-ratio transformations of three compositional variables. The error distortion, amplification and reduction, evidenced in a ternary diagram, were not observed in any of the bivariate diagrams based on log-ratio transformations, in which equal %RSD errors in the initial compositional variables showed equal standard deviation values in the transformed space. As an example of these findings, the three types of log-ratio transformations were evaluated from a geochemical database of basaltic rocks from arc (IAB), within-plate (WPB), and mid-ocean ridge (MORB) tectonic settings, as better, statistically coherent alternatives to the highly used Zr-3Y-Ti/100 ternary diagram. This diagram showed relatively low (<25%), acceptable (86%), and nonexistent (0%) correct discrimination for the arc, within-plate, and mid-ocean ridge settings, respectively. The exact same bivariate diagram, with correct discrimination of 46.2%, 89.0%, and 60.6%, respectively, for IAB, WPB, and MORB was obtained from linear discriminant analysis performed on the additive, centered, and isometric log-ratio transformations of the same database. Nevertheless, the fulfillment of the basic assumption of statistical samples drawn from binomial distributions before linear discriminant analysis increased the correct discrimination in the new bivariate diagrams by about 0.5% to 1.5% for IAB, 1.1% to 7.3% for WPB, and -7.7% to +0.9% for MORB. The performance of the new bivariate diagrams was significantly better than that of the ternary discrimination diagram. Thus, this work highlights the successful replacement of ternary diagrams by bivariate diagrams based on log-ratio transformations. Therefore, the bivariate diagram based on normally distributed isometric log-ratio data can be recommended to replace the widely used Zr-3Y-Ti/100 ternary diagram.
机译:使用100,000次大型复制的蒙特卡洛模拟法来评估最终的总传播误差,该误差由常规三元图以及基于统计相干加法,中心为中心的二元图中的标准偏差或相对标准偏差百分比(%RSD)表示。以及三个组成变量的等距对数比转换。在基于对数比转换的任何双变量图中均未观察到三元图所示的误差失真,放大和减少,其中初始成分变量中相等的%RSD误差在变换空间中显示相同的标准偏差值。作为这些发现的一个例子,从弧(IAB),板内(WPB)和中洋脊(MORB)构造背景的玄武岩的地球化学数据库中评估了三种类型的对数比转换,效果更好,是高度常用的Zr-3Y-Ti / 100三元图的统计相关替代。该图分别显示了弧度,板内和洋中脊设置的相对较低(<25%),可接受(86%)和不存在(0%)的正确判别。 IAB,WPB和MORB的完全相同的双变量图分别对加法,对中和等轴对数比变换进行线性判别分析,分别获得了IAB,WPB和MORB的正确判别分别为46.2%,89.0%和60.6%。相同的数据库。尽管如此,在线性判别分析之前满足从二项式分布中提取的统计样本的基本假设,在新的双变量图中,IAB的正确辨别率分别提高了约0.5%至1.5%,WPB的1.1%至7.3%和-7.7%到MORB的+ 0.9%。新的双变量图的性能明显优于三元判别图。因此,这项工作强调了基于对数比转换的三元图成功地被二元图替换。因此,建议使用基于正态分布等距对数比数据的二元图来代替广泛使用的Zr-3Y-Ti / 100三元图。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号