首页> 外文期刊>Genetic epidemiology. >Using evidence for population stratification bias in combined individual- and family-level genetic association analyses of quantitative traits.
【24h】

Using evidence for population stratification bias in combined individual- and family-level genetic association analyses of quantitative traits.

机译:在定量特征的个人和家庭水平遗传关联分析中使用人口分层偏倚证据。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Genetic association studies are generally performed either by examining differences in the genotype distribution between individuals or by testing for preferential allele transmission within families. In the absence of population stratification bias (PSB), integrated analyses of individual and family data can increase power to identify susceptibility loci [Abecasis et al., 2000. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 66:279-292; Chen and Lin, 2008. Genet. Epidemiol. 32:520-527; Epstein et al., 2005. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 76:592-608]. In existing methods, the presence of PSB is initially assessed by comparing results from between-individual and within-family analyses, and then combined analyses are performed only if no significant PSB is detected. However, this strategy requires specification of an arbitrary testing level alpha(PSB), typically 5%, to declare PSB significance. As a novel alternative, we propose to directly use the PSB evidence in weights that combine results from between-individual and within-family analyses. The weighted approach generalizes previous methods by using a continuous weighting function that depends only on the observed P-value instead of a binary weight that depends on alpha(PSB). Using simulations, we demonstrate that for quantitative trait analysis, the weighted approach provides a good compromise between type I error control and power to detect association in studies with few genotyped markers and limited information regarding population structure.
机译:遗传关联研究通常通过检查个体之间基因型分布的差异或通过测试家庭中优先等位基因的传播来进行。在没有人口分层偏见(PSB)的情况下,对个人和家庭数据进行综合分析可以提高识别易感基因座的能力[Abecasis等,2000。 J.哼基因66:279-292; Chen和Lin,2008年。Genet。流行病。 32:520-527; Epstein et al。,2005。 J.哼基因76:592-608]。在现有方法中,最初通过比较个体之间和家庭内部分析的结果来评估PSB的存在,然后仅在未检测到显着PSB的情况下进行组合分析。但是,此策略要求指定任意测试级别alpha(PSB)(通常为5%)以声明PSB的重要性。作为一种新颖的替代方法,我们建议直接使用PSB证据权重,以结合个体之间和家庭内部分析的结果。加权方法通过使用仅依赖于观察到的P值而不是依赖于alpha(PSB)的二进制加权的连续加权函数来概括以前的方法。通过模拟,我们证明了对于定量性状分析,加权方法在类型少,基因型标记少,种群结构信息有限的研究中,可以很好地折衷I型错误控制和检测关联的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号