...
首页> 外文期刊>Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta: Journal of the Geochemical Society and the Meteoritical Society >A GLASS SPHERULE OF QUESTIONABLE IMPACT ORIGIN FROM THE APOLLO 15 LANDING SITE - UNIQUE TARGET MARE BASALT
【24h】

A GLASS SPHERULE OF QUESTIONABLE IMPACT ORIGIN FROM THE APOLLO 15 LANDING SITE - UNIQUE TARGET MARE BASALT

机译:来自APOLLO 15着陆点的可确定冲击源的玻璃球-独特的目标母马玄武岩

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A 6 mm-diameter dark spherule, 15434,28, from the regolith on the Apennine Front at the Apollo 15 landing site has a homogeneous glass interior with a 200 mu m-thick rind of devitrified or crystallized melt. The rind contains abundant small fragments of Apollo 15 olivine-normative mare basalt and rare volcanic Apollo 15 green glass. The glass interior of the spherule has the chemical composition, including a high FeO content and high CaO/Al2O3, of a mare basalt. Whereas the major element and Sc, Ni, and Co abundances are similar to those of low-Ti mare basalts, the incompatible elements and Sr abundances are similar to those of high-Ti mare basalts. The relative abundance patterns of the incompatible trace elements are distinct from any other lunar mare basalts or KREEP; among these distinctions are a much steeper slope of the heavy rare earth elements. The 15434,28 glass has abundances of the volatile element Zn consistent with both impact glasses and crystalline mare basalts, but much lower than in glasses of mare volcanic origin. The glass contains siderophile elements such as Ir in abundances only slightly higher than accepted lunar indigenous levels, and some, such as Au, are just below such upper limits. The age of the glass, determined by the Ar-40/Ar-39 laser incremental heating technique, is 1647 +/- 11 Ma (2 sigma); it is expressed as an age spectrum of seventeen steps over 96% of the Ar-39 released, unusual for an impact glass. Trapped argon is negligible. The undamaged nature of the sphere demonstrates that it must have spent most of its life buried in regolith; Ar-38 cosmic ray exposure data suggest that it was buried at less than 2m but more than a few centimeters ifa single depth is appropriate. That the spherule solidified to a glass is surprising; for such a mare composition, cooling at about 50 degrees C s(-1) is required to avoid crystallization, and barely attainable in such a large spherule. The low volatile abundances, slightly high siderophile abundances, and the young age are perhaps all most consistent with an impact origin, but nonetheless not absolutely definitive. The 15434,28 glass is distinct from the common yellow impact glasses at the Apollo 15 landing site, in particular in its lower abundances of incompatible elements and much younger age. If we accept an impact origin, then the trace element relative abundances preclude both typical KREEP and the common Apollo 15 yellow impact glass from contributing more than a few percent of the incompatible elements to potential mixtures. The melted part of any target must have consisted almost entirely of a variety (or varieties) of mare basalt or glass distinct from any known mare basalts or glasses, including Apollo 15 yellow volcanic glass, or mixtures of them. However, the rind inclusions, similar to materials of local origin, do suggest a source near the Apollo 15 landing site. An impact melt cannot have dissolved much, if any, of such inclusions. A lack of regolith materials in the rind and in the melt component suggest an immature source terrain. Thus, even for an impact origin, there is the possibility (though not requirement) that the volcanic target is younger than most mare plains. The crater Hadley C, 25 km away, is a potential source. If the 15434,28 glass is instead directly of volcanic origin, it represents an extremely young mare magma of a type previously undiscovered on the Moon. [References: 59]
机译:在阿波罗15号登陆点的亚平宁山锋上,从一块长石上的直径6毫米的暗小球,即15434,28,具有均匀的玻璃内部和200微米厚的失透或结晶熔体。外皮中含有丰富的阿波罗15号橄榄石规范母马玄武岩小碎片和稀有的火山阿波罗15号绿色玻璃。小球的玻璃内部具有母玄武岩的化学组成,包括高FeO含量和高CaO / Al2O3。主要元素和Sc,Ni和Co的丰度类似于低钛母马玄武岩,而不相容元素和Sr丰度则类似于高钛母马玄武岩。不相容的痕量元素的相对丰度模式不同于其他任何月球玄武岩或KREEP。在这些区别中,重稀土元素的斜率要大得多。 15434,28玻璃具有与冲击玻璃和结晶母马玄武岩一致的挥发性元素Zn丰度,但远低于母马火山来源的玻璃。该玻璃杯中含有大量的亲铁元素,例如Ir,其含量仅略高于公认的月球土著水平,而某些元素(例如Au)则刚好低于上述上限。通过Ar-40 / Ar-39激光增量加热技术确定的玻璃寿命为1647 +/- 11 Ma(2 sigma)。它以超过96%释放的Ar-39的十七级年龄谱表示,这对冲击玻璃来说是不同寻常的。截留的氩可以忽略不计。球体的完好无损的性质表明,球星的大部分生命必定埋藏在重石块中。 Ar-38宇宙射线暴露数据表明,如果单个深度合适,它的埋藏深度应小于2m,但应大于几厘米。球体固化成玻璃是令人惊讶的;对于这种母马组合物,需要冷却至约50℃s(-1)以避免结晶,并且在如此大的球体中几乎不能达到。低挥发性的丰度,嗜铁亲和性的丰度稍高,以及年轻可能与冲击起源最相符,但仍不是绝对的。 15434,28玻璃杯不同于阿波罗15号登陆点上常见的黄色冲击玻璃杯,尤其是其不相容元素的含量较低且年龄要年轻得多。如果我们接受冲击源,那么痕量元素的相对丰度就无法使典型的KREEP和普通的Apollo 15黄色冲击玻璃对潜在混合物造成的不相容元素的比例超过百分之几。任何目标的融化部分必须几乎完全由与任何已知的母马玄武岩或玻璃(包括阿波罗15号黄色火山玻璃或它们的混合物)不同的多种(或多种)母马玄武岩或玻璃组成。然而,与本地来源的材料相似,果皮内含物确实暗示了阿波罗15号登陆点附近的来源。冲击熔体不能充分溶解(如果有的话)这种夹杂物。外皮和熔体成分中缺乏可再生材料,表明源地不成熟。因此,即使对于撞击源,也有可能(尽管不是必须的)火山目标比大多数母马平原还年轻。 25公里外的哈德利火山口(Hadley C)是一个潜在来源。如果说15434,28玻璃不是直接来自火山,则代表了一种极年轻的母马岩浆,其类型是以前在月球上未发现的。 [参考:59]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号