首页> 外文期刊>Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta: Journal of the Geochemical Society and the Meteoritical Society >Calcite-filled borings in the most recently deposited skeleton in live-collected Porites (Scleractinia): Implications for trace element archives
【24h】

Calcite-filled borings in the most recently deposited skeleton in live-collected Porites (Scleractinia): Implications for trace element archives

机译:活体采集的孔隙中最近沉积的骨架中的方解石填充钻孔(Scleractinia):对痕量元素档案的意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Skeletons of the scleractinian coral Porites are widely utilized as archives of geochemical proxies for, among other things, sea surface temperature in paleoclimate studies. Here, we document live-collected Porites lobata specimens wherein as much as 60% of the most recently deposited skeletal aragonite, i.e., the part of the skeleton that projects into the layer of living polyps and thus is still in direct contact with living coral tissue, has been bored and replaced by calcite cement. Calcite and aragonite were identified in situ using Raman microspectroscopy. The boring-filling calcite cement has significantly different trace element ratios (Sr/Ca-(mmol/mol) 6.3 +/- 1.4; Mg/Ca-(mmol/mol) = 12.0 +/- 5.1) than the host coral skeletal aragonite (Sr/Ca-(mmol/mol) = 9.9 +/- 1.3; Mg/Ca-(mmol/mol) = 4- 5 +/- 2.3). The borings appear to have been excavated by a coccoid cyanobacterium that dissolved aragonite at one end and induced calcite precipitation at the other end as it migrated through the coral skeleton. Boring activity and cement precipitation occurred concomitantly with coral skeleton growth, thus replacing skeletal aragonite that was only days to weeks old in some cases. Although the cement-filled borings were observed in only similar to 20% of sampled corals, their occurrence in some of the most recently produced coral skeleton suggests that any corallum could contain such cements, irrespective of the coral's subsequent diagenetic history. In other words, pristine skeletal aragonite was not preserved in parts of some corals for even a few weeks. Although not well documented in coral skeletons, microbes that concomitantly excavate carbonate while inducing cement precipitation in their borings may be common in the ubiquitous communities that carry out micritization of carbonate grains in shallow carbonate settings. Thus, such phenomena may be widespread, and failure to recognize even very small quantities of early cement-filled borings in corals used for paleoclimate studies could compromise high resolution paleotemperature reconstructions. The inability to predict the occurrence of cement-filled borings in coralla combined with the difficulty in recognizing them on polished blocks highlights the great care that must be taken in vetting samples both for bulk and microanalysis of geochemistry. (c) 2007 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
机译:Scleractinian珊瑚的骨骼Porites被广泛用作地球化学代理的档案,其中包括古气候研究中的海表温度。在这里,我们记录了活体采集的多孔叶珊瑚标本,其中多达60%的最近沉积的骨架文石,即伸入活息肉层并因此仍与活珊瑚组织直接接触的骨骼部分,已经无聊,被方解石水泥替代。方解石和文石使用拉曼光谱法原位鉴定。与主体珊瑚骨架文石相比,钻孔填充方解石水泥的痕量元素比率(Sr / Ca-(mmol / mol)6.3 +/- 1.4; Mg / Ca-(mmol / mol)= 12.0 +/- 5.1)有显着不同。 (Sr / Ca-(mmol / mol)= 9.9 +/- 1.3; Mg / Ca-(mmol / mol)= 4 +/- 2.3)。这些钻孔似乎是由球状蓝藻细菌挖出的,该球藻的一端溶解文石,另一端诱导方解石沉淀,因为它迁移穿过珊瑚骨骼。钻孔活动和水泥沉淀伴随珊瑚骨骼的生长而发生,因此在某些情况下取代了仅几天到几周大的骨骼文石。尽管仅在大约20%的采样珊瑚中观察到了充满水泥的钻孔,但它们出现在一些最近生产的珊瑚骨骼中,这表明任何珊瑚都可能包含此类水泥,而与珊瑚随后的成岩史无关。换句话说,原始珊瑚文石甚至在几个星期内都没有被保存。尽管在珊瑚骨骼中没有很好的记录,但是在浅碳酸盐岩环境中进行碳酸盐微晶化的普遍存在的社区中,伴随挖掘碳酸盐而在钻孔中诱发水泥沉淀的微生物可能很常见。因此,这种现象可能很普遍,如果未能识别出用于古气候研究的珊瑚中即使很小数量的早期水泥填充钻孔,也可能损害高分辨率古温度重建。无法预测珊瑚中水泥填充钻孔的发生,加上难以在抛光块上识别它们,凸显了在对样品进行大体积和地球化学分析时必须格外小心。 (c)2007年由Elsevier Ltd.发布。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号