首页> 外文期刊>Evidence-based nursing >A target backrest elevation of 45deg was not feasible for mechanically ventilated patients; elevations achieved did not prevent ventilator associated pneumonia
【24h】

A target backrest elevation of 45deg was not feasible for mechanically ventilated patients; elevations achieved did not prevent ventilator associated pneumonia

机译:对于机械通气患者,将靠背目标高度抬高45度是不可行的。升高并不能预防呼吸机相关性肺炎

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

VAP prevention guidelines recommend that intubated patients maintain a semirecumbent position;this recommendation is based on 1 randomised trial that reported lower VAP rates with semirecumbent compared with supine positioning.Additional suppoil is provided by studies that showed a reduction in feed aspiration, a risk factor for VAP, in the semirecumbent position.Because semirecumbenl was defined as 45 deg backrest elevation, early recommendations promoted this angle of elevation; unfortunately, implementation has proven to be more difficult than anticipated. Barriers include patient discomfort and traditional pressure ulcer prevention guidelines that discourage high Fowler's positioning.In an effort to increase compliance, some backrest elevation goals have been modified to 30deg; however, no evidence exists to support the efficacy of this lower angle.In an attempt to validate the findings of the previous trial/ van Nieuwenhoven et al compared an intended backrest elevation of 45 deg with standard care (10deg rather than true supine positioning). Study strength-include rigorous methods for assessing adherence to group assignment and measurement of true backrest elevation every 60 seconds by transducer. Although backrest elevation was adjusted 2-3 times per dc;y (compared with once daily in the previous trial ), mean elevation in the semirecumbent group was only 28 deg and 23 deg on days 1 and 7 respectively, compared with 10 deg and 16 deg in the control group. VAP rates did not differ between groups.Although these findings validate concerns about the feasibility of 4s backrest elevation, new questions have been raised. Was 45 deg elevation truly achieved in the previous trial? Was 28 deg too low, was 10 deg hicjh enough, and was the achieved elevation in the semirecumbenf group too similar to that used in the control group to show an outcome difference? Until definitive evidence about the optimal angle of elevation ii available, nurses should continue to maintain backrest elevation at the highest level tolerated (unless contraindicated). Side to side repositioning is important to reduce the risk of complications, and diligent skin integriv monitoring promotes early detection and intervention.
机译:VAP预防指南建议插管患者保持半卧位;该建议基于一项随机试验,该研究报告半卧位的VAP率低于仰卧位。 VAP,处于半卧位。由于将半卧位定义为45度靠背仰角,因此早期建议可提高该仰角。不幸的是,事实证明实施起来比预期的要困难。障碍包括患者不适和传统的预防压疮的指南,这些指南不利于Fowler的高度定位。为了验证先前试验的结果,van Nieuwenhoven等人比较了标准护理时预期的45度仰角抬高角度(10度而不是真正的仰卧位)。研究强度,包括严格的方法,用于评估对小组分配的依从性,并通过换能器每60秒测量一次真实的靠背高度。尽管靠背的抬高调整为每dc; y 2-3次(与之前的试验中每天一次相比),但半卧躺组在第1天和第7天的平均抬高分别仅为28度和23度,而10度和16天分别为28度和23度。对照组。两组之间的VAP率无差异。尽管这些发现证实了对4s靠背抬高可行性的担忧,但仍提出了新的问题。在先前的试验中,是否确实实现了45度仰角? 28度太低了吗?足够10度高了吗?semirecumbenf组达到的升高与对照组所达到的升高是否太相似,从而显示出结果差异?除非有确凿的最佳仰角ii的证据,否则护士应继续将靠背的仰角保持在允许的最高水平(除非有禁忌)。左右重新定位对于降低并发症风险很重要,而勤奋的皮肤完整性监测可促进早期发现和干预。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号