首页> 外文期刊>Experiments in Fluids: Experimental Methods and Their Applications to Fluid Flow >A comparative study of five different PIV interrogation algorithms
【24h】

A comparative study of five different PIV interrogation algorithms

机译:五个不同的PIV询问算法的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Five different particle image velocimetry (PIV) interrogation algorithms are tested with numerically generated particle images and two real data sets measured in turbulent flows with relatively small particle images of size 1.0-2.5 pixels. The size distribution of the particle images is analyzed for both the synthetic and the real data in order to evaluate the tendency for peak-locking occurrence. First, the accuracy of the algorithms in terms of mean bias and rms error is compared to simulated data. Then, the algorithms' ability to handle the peak-locking effect in an accelerating flow through a 2:1 contraction is compared, and their ability to estimate the rms and Reynolds shear stress profiles in a near-wall region of a turbulent boundary layer (TBL) at Re-tau=510 is analyzed. The results of the latter case are compared to direct numerical simulation (DNS) data of a TBL. The algorithms are: standard fast Fourier transform cross-correlation (FFT-CC), direct normalized cross-correlation (DNCC), iterative FFT-CC with discrete window shift (DWS), iterative FFT-CC with continuous window shift (CWS), and iterative FFT-CC CWS with image deformation (CWD). Gaussian three-point peak fitting for sub-pixel estimation is used in all the algorithms. According to the tests with the non-deformation algorithms, DNCC seems to give the best rms estimation by the wall, and the CWS methods give slightly smaller peak-locking observations than the other methods. With the CWS methods, a bias error compensation method for the bilinear image interpolation, based on the particle image size analysis, is developed and tested, giving the same performance as the image interpolation based on the cardinal function. With the CWD algorithms, the effect of the spatial filter size between the iteration loops is analyzed, and it is found to have a strong effect on the results. In the near-wall region, the turbulence intensity varies by up to 4%, depending on the chosen interrogation algorithm. In addition, the algorithms' computational performance is tested.
机译:测试了五种不同的粒子图像测速(PIV)询问算法,分别用数字生成的粒子图像和在湍流中测量的两个真实数据集(具有1.0-2.5像素大小的相对较小的粒子图像)进行了测试。分析了合成图像和实际数据的粒子图像大小分布,以评估出现峰锁定的趋势。首先,将算法在均值偏差和均方根误差方面的准确性与仿真数据进行比较。然后,比较了该算法在通过2:1收缩的加速流中处理峰值锁定效应的能力,并评估了在湍流边界层近壁区域中均方根和雷诺剪切应力分布的能力(分析Re-tau = 510处的TBL)。将后一种情况的结果与TBL的直接数值模拟(DNS)数据进行比较。这些算法是:标准快速傅立叶变换互相关(FFT-CC),直接归一化互相关(DNCC),带离散窗移的迭代FFT-CC(DWS),带连续窗移的迭代FFT-CC(CWS),以及具有图像变形(CWD)的迭代FFT-CC CWS。所有算法均使用高斯三点峰拟合进行子像素估计。根据使用非变形算法进行的测试,DNCC似乎提供了墙的最佳均方根估计值,而CWS方法提供的峰锁观测值比其他方法小得多。使用CWS方法,基于粒子图像尺寸分析,开发并测试了用于双线性图像插值的偏差误差补偿方法,其性能与基于基数函数的图像插值相同。使用CWD算法,分析了迭代循环之间空间滤波器大小的影响,发现它对结果有很强的影响。在近壁区域中,湍流强度最多变化4%,具体取决于所选择的询问算法。此外,还测试了算法的计算性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号