首页> 外文期刊>Evidence-based mental health >Do antidepressants work? A commentary on 'Initial severity and antidepressant benefits: a meta-analysis of data submitted to the Food and Drug Administration' by Kirsch et al.
【24h】

Do antidepressants work? A commentary on 'Initial severity and antidepressant benefits: a meta-analysis of data submitted to the Food and Drug Administration' by Kirsch et al.

机译:抗抑郁药有效吗? Kirsch等人对“最初的严重程度和抗抑郁作用:提交给食品和药物管理局的数据进行的荟萃分析”的评论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The publication of this meta-analysis1 received a vast amount of coverage in the UK. This is despite the "bottom line" that the review does not report any novel findings-antidepressants work and their effectiveness increases with baseline severity of depression. This was not the picture painted in the media. Rather the conclusions drawn by the authors took an extreme viewpoint and the review's publication was sensationalised both by the journal editor and the media. It is difficult to fully understand the reasons for this. Antidepressants have had a bad press in recent years over a nuniber of issues (for example, discontinuation/withdrawal andsuicidality) and the authors' conclusions were in a similar "anti-antidepressant" vein-that they don't work.
机译:这项荟萃分析的出版物在英国获得了广泛的报道。尽管有“底线”,但该评论并未报告任何新的发现-抗抑郁药的作用,并且其有效性随基线抑郁症的严重程度而增加。这不是媒体上描绘的图画。相反,作者得出的结论持极端观点,该评论的发表受到期刊编辑和媒体的轰动。很难完全理解其原因。近年来,抗抑郁药在众多问题上(例如停药/撤药和自杀性)受到了负面报道,并且作者的结论也具有类似的“抗抗抑郁药”的含义,即它们无效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号