...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of organic chemistry >Carboxylate binding by indole-based guanidinium receptors: Acylguanidinium cations are better than aromatic guanidinium cations
【24h】

Carboxylate binding by indole-based guanidinium receptors: Acylguanidinium cations are better than aromatic guanidinium cations

机译:吲哚基胍盐受体与羧酸盐的结合:酰基胍盐阳离子比芳香族胍盐阳离子更好

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The synthesis of three new indole-based guanidinium cations 3, 4, and 16, that feature two different types of anion binding sites, either an acylguanidium cation (3) or an aromatic guanidinium cation (4) or both (16), is presented. NMR binding studies with N-acetylalaninecarboxylate as substrate in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) show that the acylated guanidinium cation is a significantly better anion binding site than the aromatic cation by at least one order of magnitude. Therefore, in dication 16, which possesses both binding sites, stepwise formation of the 1:1 and the 1:2 complex is observed with similar affinities for each binding site to those determined for the monocations 3 and 4. However, a more detailed analysis using isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) studies revealed that this apparent similarity in affinity is due to completely different thermodynamic reasons. For example, whereas substrate binding by the acylguanidinium cation in 3 is controlled by enthalpy, complex formation by the same binding site in dication 16 is driven by entropy. Simply looking at association constants or ΔG values can, therefore, be misleading. A thorough understanding of molecular recognition events requires closer inspection of ΔH and ΔS. Acylguanidinium cations (blue) make significantly better anion binding sites than aromatic guanidinium cations (red), however, identical affinities for a binding site in different receptors can arise for completelydifferent thermodynamic reasons. These results underline the importance of undertaking a detailed thermodynamic analysis to fully understand molecular recognition processes.
机译:介绍了三个新的基于吲哚的胍盐阳离子3、4和16的合成,这些阳离子具有两种不同类型的阴离子结合位点,即酰基胍阳离子(3)或芳香族胍盐阳离子(4)或两者(16)。 。在二甲亚砜(DMSO)中以N-乙酰丙氨酸羧酸盐为底物的NMR结合研究表明,酰化的胍盐阳离子比芳香族阳离子的阴离子结合位点至少好一个数量级。因此,在具有两个结合位点的药物16中,观察到逐步形成1:1和1:2络合物,每个结合位点的亲和力与单阳离子3和4的亲和力相似。但是,更详细的分析使用等温滴定热法(ITC)的研究表明,这种亲和力的明显相似性是由于完全不同的热力学原因所致。例如,尽管在3中通过酰基胍鎓阳离子进行的底物结合是由焓控制的,但是在指示剂16中通过相同的结合位点的复合物形成是由熵驱动的。因此,仅查看关联常数或ΔG值可能会产生误导。对分子识别事件的透彻了解需要更仔细地检查ΔH和ΔS。酰基胍盐阳离子(蓝色)比芳香族胍盐阳离子(红色)具有更好的阴离子结合位点,但是,由于完全不同的热力学原因,可以在不同受体中产生相同的结合位点亲和力。这些结果强调了进行详细的热力学分析以充分理解分子识别过程的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号