首页> 外文期刊>European journal of ophthalmology >Retinal nerve fiber layer measurement and diagnostic capability of spectral-domain versus time-domain optical coherence tomography.
【24h】

Retinal nerve fiber layer measurement and diagnostic capability of spectral-domain versus time-domain optical coherence tomography.

机译:视网膜神经纤维层的测量和光谱域与时域光学相干断层扫描的诊断能力。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and diagnostic capability of spectral-domain (CirrusTM) versus time-domain (Stratus(R)) optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS: A total of 123 eyes of 123 subjects including 68 normal, 32 glaucoma suspect, and 23 patients with glaucoma were prospectively recruited for the study. All subjects were scanned by Stratus(R) and CirrusTM OCT in the same session. Average and quadrant peripapillary RNFL measurements by both machines were correlated using Spearman correlation coefficient, and agreement between testing methods was analyzed by Bland-Altman plots. The area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) for glaucoma diagnosis was calculated. RESULTS: Average RNFL thickness were significantly thinner on the CirrusTM compared to the Stratus(R) OCT in normal subjects and glaucoma suspects (p<0.001), but thicker on the CirrusTM OCT in glaucoma patients, though the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.53). There was good correlation between the measurements in all 3 groups. In normal controls, the average, superior, nasal, inferior, and temporal correlations were r = 0.668, 0.601, 0.508, 0.620, and 0.660, p<0.001, respectively. In glaucomatous eyes, the corresponding values were r = 0.560, p = 0.005; r = 0.423, p = 0.04; r = 0.117, p = 0.596; r = 0.742, p<0.001; r = 0.669, p<0.001, respectively. The 95% limits of agreement of average RNFL thickness were -30.2 to 13.8 microm. Area under receiver operating characteristic curves for diagnosing glaucoma were comparable (superior RNFL thickness by CirrusTM 0.925; average RNFL thickness by Stratus(R) 0.987). Highest correlated AUCs were for inferior and temporal quadrants. CONCLUSIONS: Retinal nerve fiber layer measurements on the CirrusTM and Stratus(R) OCT correlate well but do not have clinically acceptable agreement between their measurements. The instruments may not be used interchangeably.
机译:目的:比较视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)的厚度和光谱域(CirrusTM)与时域(Stratus(R))光学相干断层扫描(OCT)的诊断能力。方法:前瞻性招募了123名受试者的123眼,包括68名正常人,32名青光眼嫌疑人和23名青光眼患者。所有受试者均在同一疗程中通过Stratus(R)和CirrusTM OCT进行扫描。使用Spearman相关系数将两台机器的平均和象限周围乳突RNFL测量值进行关联,并通过Bland-Altman图分析测试方法之间的一致性。计算用于青光眼诊断的接受者工作特征曲线(AUC)下的面积。结果:与正常人和青光眼疑似患者的Stratus(R)OCT相比,CirrusTM的平均RNFL厚度显着更薄(p <0.001),但青光眼患者的CirrusTM OCT的平均RNFL厚度更厚,尽管差异无统计学意义(p = 0.53)。 3组的测量值之间均具有良好的相关性。在正常对照中,平均,上,鼻,下和时间的相关性分别为r = 0.668、0.601、0.508、0.620和0.660,p <0.001。在青光眼中,相应的值为r = 0.560,p = 0.005; r = 0.423,p = 0.04; r = 0.117,p = 0.596; r = 0.742,p <0.001; r分别为0.669,p <0.001。 RNFL平均厚度的95%一致极限为-30.2至13.8微米。可用于诊断青光眼的接受者工作特征曲线下的面积可比(CirrusTM优于RNFL厚度0.925; Stratus(R)优于RNFL平均厚度0.987)。最高相关的AUC用于下象限和颞象限。结论:在CirrusTM和Stratus(R)OCT上的视网膜神经纤维层测量值相关性很好,但它们之间的测量值在临床上并不一致。仪器不能互换使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号