首页> 外文期刊>European journal of ophthalmology >Evaluating a new disc staging scale for glaucomatous damage: the ability to detect change over time.
【24h】

Evaluating a new disc staging scale for glaucomatous damage: the ability to detect change over time.

机译:评估新的青光眼损害的光盘分期量表:发现随着时间变化的能力。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE. To assess the ability of Disc Damage Likelihood Scale (DDLS) in detecting glaucomatous changes in the optic nerve on sequential optic disc stereo-photographs as compared with three other different cup/disc grading systems (C/D). METHODS. Eighty-three pairs of stereo-photographs with a minimum of 5-year follow-up were examined by one group of three observers masked to chronological order by using their clinical expertise. Their conclusions were considered gold standard. Another group of three glaucoma experts examined the same masked pairs to evaluate glaucomatous changes using four different optic nerve grading systems: DDLS, vertical, horizontal, and maximal cup/disc. Ratings of these four methods in the second group were then compared with the gold standard. RESULTS. Baseline and follow-up photographs of 83 eyes were included. Mean follow-up was 6 years. The sensitivities for detecting glaucomatous nerve changes were 71.4%, 63.9%, 66.7%, and 47.2% for DDLS, vertical, horizontal, and maximal cup/disc, respectively. The specificity for finding nerve change was 70.9%, 51.1%, 40.4%, and 48.9%, respectively. The proportion of photographs identified as showing glaucomatous changes differed significantly between the DDLS and vertical C/D (VCD) (χ2=7.900, p=0.005), between the DDLS and horizontal C/D (HCD) (χ2=13.89, p=0.000), and between DDLS and maximum C/D (MCD) (χ2=4.192, p=0.041). The largest area (74.4%) under the receiver operator characteristic curve was obtained by using the DDLS. CONCLUSIONS. DDLS had higher sensitivity and specificity for detecting glaucomatous changes versus the other three C/Ds when considering sequential stereo-photographs.
机译:目的。与其他三个不同的杯/盘分级系统(C / D)相比,要评估椎间盘损伤可能性量表(DDLS)在连续视盘立体照片上检测视神经的青光眼变化的能力。方法。由三名观察员组成的一组观察者对83幅至少5年随访的立体照片进行了检查,这些观察者使用其临床专业知识按时间顺序排列。他们的结论被认为是金标准。另一组由三名青光眼专家组成的小组使用四个不同的视神经分级系统(DDLS,垂直,水平和最大杯/盘)检查了相同的假面对,以评估青光眼的变化。然后将第二组中这四种方法的评级与金标准进行比较。结果。包括83眼的基线和随访照片。平均随访6年。对于DDLS,垂直,水平和最大杯/盘,检测青光眼神经变化的敏感性分别为71.4%,63.9%,66.7%和47.2%。发现神经改变的特异性分别为70.9%,51.1%,40.4%和48.9%。在DDLS和垂直C / D(VCD)之间,被识别为显示青光眼变化的照片比例显着不同(χ2= 7.900,p = 0.005),在DDLS和水平C / D(HCD)之间(χ2= 13.89,p = 0.000),且介于DDLS和最大C / D(MCD)之间(χ2= 4.192,p = 0.041)。通过使用DDLS,可以得到接收机操作员特性曲线下的最大面积(74.4%)。结论。当考虑连续的立体照片时,与其他三个C / D相比,DDLS在检测青光眼变化方面具有更高的灵敏度和特异性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号