首页> 外文期刊>Burns: Including Thermal Injury >Adherence to National Burn Care Review referral criteria in a paediatric Emergency Department.
【24h】

Adherence to National Burn Care Review referral criteria in a paediatric Emergency Department.

机译:遵守儿科急诊科的国家烧伤护理复诊标准。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: The National Burn Care Review (NBCR) gives guidance on the recognition of potentially complex burns requiring assessment and management in a burn unit. This guidance provides a referral framework for those initiating assessment and management of burns. The effect of close adherence to NBCR guidance on workload is at present unknown. OBJECTIVES: To audit referral patterns of burns in our paediatric Emergency Department (ED) in comparison to NBCR referral criteria. To identify the type of injuries not referred despite meeting criteria, and their outcomes, to assess whether these patients come to any harm short-term. To estimate the effect that closer adherence would have on workload and how our unit proposes to work with the ED to improve its distribution and our patients care. METHODS: A retrospective case-note audit of patients presenting to a paediatric ED with a triage diagnosis of "burn/scald" over a 6-month period between 1st April and 29th September 2008. RESULTS: 190 patients presented with burns during this period, of which 126 (66%) had potentially complex burns. Of these, 93 (74%) were not referred to the burns unit i.e. were "under-referred". In this group burns to specialized areas in patients under 5 years of age were particularly prevalent. 78 (84%) were reviewed in the ED and received no specialist input. Seven patients suffered minor complications. Only three of these patients (3.2%) required subsequent referral to the burns unit for opinion. None required any further specialist intervention. CONCLUSION: Strict adherence to NBCR referral criteria could result in a significant increase in workload for regional burn units with as yet unquantifiable benefit in patient outcomes. Many minor injuries appear to be safely managed in the ED with little adverse outcome. Even small improvements in practice could result in a considerable workload increase for a burns unit. Further prospective research is required, particularly looking at longer-term outcomes. We are hoping to improve educational and clinical links between our EDs and burn unit to improve patient care and distribution of clinical workload. Further national guidance maybe necessary.
机译:简介:《国家烧伤护理评论》(NBCR)提供了有关识别潜在复杂烧伤的指南,需要对烧伤单位进行评估和管理。本指南为那些开始评估和管理烧伤的人提供了参考框架。目前尚不清楚严格遵守NBCR指南对工作量的影响。目的:与NBCR转诊标准相比,对我们儿科急诊科(ED)的烧伤转诊模式进行审核。确定尽管符合标准但仍未转诊的伤害类型及其后果,以评估这些患者短期是否遭受任何伤害。为了评估更严格的依从性对工作量的影响以及我们单位建议与急诊室合作以改善急诊室的分布和对患者的护理的作用。方法:对2008年4月1日至9月29日之间6个月内诊断为“烧伤/烫伤”的儿科急诊科患者进行回顾性病例注释审核。结果:190名患者在此期间出现烧伤,其中126个(66%)具有潜在的复杂烧伤。其中有93(74%)个未提及烧伤科,即“未充分提及”。在该组中,尤其是5岁以下患者的烧伤至专业区域。急诊科对78例(84%)的患者进行了审查,但未收到专家意见。七例患者发生了轻微并发症。这些患者中只有三名(3.2%)需要随后转诊至烧伤科以征询意见。不需要任何进一步的专家干预。结论:严格遵守NBCR转诊标准可能会导致区域烧伤病房的工作量显着增加,而对患者结局的益处尚无法量化。急诊部似乎对许多轻伤进行了安全处理,几乎没有不良后果。实践中即使是很小的改进也可能导致燃烧单元的工作量显着增加。需要进一步的前瞻性研究,尤其是长期目标。我们希望改善急诊室和烧伤科之间的教育和临床联系,以改善患者护理和临床工作量的分配。可能需要进一步的国家指导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号