...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Operational Research >Suitability and redundancy of non-homogeneous weight restrictions for measuring the relative efficiency in DEA
【24h】

Suitability and redundancy of non-homogeneous weight restrictions for measuring the relative efficiency in DEA

机译:非均匀重量限制在DEA中测量相对效率的适用性和冗余

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Weight restrictions are non-homogeneous if they are formulated as linear `less than or equal to' inequalities with a non-zero constant on the right-hand side. Absolute weight bounds are typical examples. It has recently been shown that, in the presence of such restrictions, the fractional linear data envelopment analysis (DEA) model and its linear forms may incorrectly evaluate the maximum relative efficiency of the assessed unit. This paper investigates the problem further, and identifies certain types of non-homogeneous restrictions that do not cause the observed error. Thus the relative efficiency is always assessed correctly if, in the same CCR model, no positive lower bounds are imposed on any of the input weights and no upper bounds are imposed on any of the output weights. The redundancy of certain types of weight restrictions in DEA models is also considered. Based on this, the traditional use of small positive constants to separate weights from zero in DEA models is questioned.
机译:如果权重限制被公式化为线性“小于或等于”不等式,并且右侧的常数不为零,则它们是不均匀的。绝对重量范围是典型示例。最近显示,在存在此类限制的情况下,分数线性数据包络分析(DEA)模型及其线性形式可能会错误地评估被评估单元的最大相对效率。本文将进一步研究该问题,并确定不会导致所观察到的错误的某些类型的非均匀限制。因此,如果在相同的CCR模型中,没有对任何输入权重施加正下限,而对任何输出权重施加上限,则总是正确地评估了相对效率。还考虑了DEA模型中某些类型的权重限制的冗余性。基于此,人们对在DEA模型中使用小正常数将权重与零分开的传统提出了质疑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号