...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Operational Research >A comparison of genetic and conventional methods for the solution of integer goal programmes
【24h】

A comparison of genetic and conventional methods for the solution of integer goal programmes

机译:遗传算法与常规方法求解整数目标程序的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper discusses two different approaches to the solution of difficult Goal Programming (GP) models. An integer Goal Programming (IGP) solve and some genetically driven multi-objective methods are developed. Specialised GP speed up techniques and analysis tools are employed in th design and development of the solution systems. A selection of linear integer models of small to medium size with an internal structure that makes solution difficult are considered. These problems are solved by both methods in order to assess their computational performance over several criteria and to compare the differences between them. From the results obtained in this research, it is observed that genetic algorithms (GA) have performed in general less efficiently than the Integer Goal Programming system for the sample of problems analysed.
机译:本文讨论了两种解决困难目标编程(GP)模型的方法。整数目标规划(IGP)求解,并开发了一些遗传驱动的多目标方法。解决方案系统的设计和开发中采用了专门的GP加速技术和分析工具。考虑选择具有内部结构的小到中等大小的线性整数模型,这些模型使求解变得困难。两种方法都解决了这些问题,以便评估它们在多个标准上的计算性能并比较它们之间的差异。从本研究中获得的结果可以看出,对于所分析的问题样本,遗传算法(GA)的执行效率通常比整数目标规划系统低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号