...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Operational Research >Two-period dynamic versus fixed-ratio pricing in a capacity constrained duopoly
【24h】

Two-period dynamic versus fixed-ratio pricing in a capacity constrained duopoly

机译:容量受限的双头垄断下的两期间动态定价与固定比率定价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper analyzes the impact of dynamic and fixed-ratio pricing policies on firm profits and equilibrium prices under competition. Firms that have equal inventories of perfectly substitutable and perishable products compete for customer segments that demand the product at different times. In each period, customers first purchase from the low price firm and then from the high price firm up to their inventories, provided the prices are lower than the maximum they are willing to pay. The main conclusions of this paper are as follows: although dynamic pricing is a more sophisticated policy than fixed-ratio pricing, it may lead to decreased equilibrium profits; under both pricing policies, one firm assumes the role of a low-cost high-output firm while the other assumes the role of a high-cost low-output firm; and, the supply demand ratio has more impact on the outcome of the competition than the heterogeneity in consumer reservation prices.
机译:本文分析了动态和固定比率定价政策对竞争下企业利润和均衡价格的影响。具有完全可替代和易腐烂产品的相同库存的公司竞争在不同时间需求产品的客户群。在每个阶段,只要价格低于他们愿意支付的最高价格,客户就会先从低价公司购买,然后再从高价公司购买直到其库存。本文的主要结论如下:尽管动态定价是比固定比例定价更为复杂的政策,但它可能导致均衡利润下降。在这两种定价政策下,一家公司承担低成本高产出公司的角色,而另一家承担高成本低产出公司的角色;而且,供应需求比率对竞争结果的影响要大于消费者保留价格的异质性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号