首页> 外文期刊>European journal of oncology nursing: the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society >Pushed monocanalicular intubation: An alternative stenting system for the management of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstructions
【24h】

Pushed monocanalicular intubation: An alternative stenting system for the management of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstructions

机译:推动单管插管:一种用于治疗先天性鼻泪管阻塞的替代支架系统

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To present our experience with a "pushed" monocanalicular nasolacrimal intubation device in the management of nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children. Methods: The cases of consecutive patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction who were treated with primary probing and intubation with the Masterka were reviewed retrospectively. The Masterka includes a metal guide placed inside a silicone tube for "pushed" intubation as opposed to material attached at the distal end of the silicone for intranasal retrieval ("pulled" intubations). All procedures were accomplished with the patients receiving masked airway anesthesia; neither laryngeal mask airway nor endotracheal intubation was necessary. Only patients noted to have a membranous (mucosal) obstruction were considered for treatment with the Masterka. The duration of operation, duration of stent intubation, and severity of symptoms on follow-up were noted. Success was defined as absence of symptoms after stent removal or loss. Results: A total of 110 eyes of 88 patients were included (average age, 2.4 years; range, 1-8 years). The average operating time was 3 minutes (range, 2-9 minutes). Persistent tearing on follow-up with the stent in place was noted in 26 eyes (24%); tearing resolved after stent removal in 19 eyes (73%). Success was achieved in 94 eyes (85%). with an average follow-up of 33.7 weeks (range, 4-139). Keratitis was noted in 2 eyes (2%). Early stent loss occurred in 17 ducts (15%). Conclusions: The Masterka was an effective primary treatment for nasolacrimal duct obstruction associated with mucosal obstructions in this small series of patients.
机译:目的:介绍我们在儿童鼻泪管阻塞治疗中使用“推动式”单泪小管鼻泪管插管设备的经验。方法:回顾性分析Masterka进行初次探查和插管的连续鼻泪管阻塞患者。 Masterka包括一个放置在硅胶管内的金属导管,用于“推”式插管,与附在硅胶远端用于鼻内取回的材料(“拉式”插管)相反。所有手术均在接受气膜罩麻醉的患者中完成;不需要喉罩气道或气管插管。 Masterka仅考虑注意到有膜(粘膜)阻塞的患者。记录手术时间,支架插管时间和随访症状的严重程度。成功定义为支架移除或丢失后无症状。结果:共纳入88例患者的110眼(平均年龄2.4岁;范围1-8岁)。平均操作时间为3分钟(范围2-9分钟)。在26眼(24%)中观察到在固定支架的情况下持续撕裂。拆除支架后的撕裂消失了19眼(73%)。 94眼(85%)获得了成功。平均随访33.7周(范围4-139)。两只眼睛中有角膜炎(2%)。早期支架丢失发生在17个导管中(占15%)。结论:Masterka是该小系列患者鼻粘膜阻塞相关的鼻泪管阻塞的有效主要治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号