...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of oncology nursing: the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society >Does the number of exogenous infections increase in paediatric oncology patients when sterile surgical gloves are not worn for accessing central venous access devices?
【24h】

Does the number of exogenous infections increase in paediatric oncology patients when sterile surgical gloves are not worn for accessing central venous access devices?

机译:如果不戴无菌外科手套进入中央静脉通路装置,小儿肿瘤患者的外源性感染数量会增加吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The aim of this study was to determine whether the routine use of sterile gloves when accessing central venous catheters (CVCs) affects the incidence of exogenous septicaemia in paediatric oncology patients. The 36-month study period ran prospectively from September 2000 to August 2003. During this time the routine use of sterile gloves for accessing CVCs was suspended. Sterile gloves were only used when obtaining blood samples from the line or injecting substances that required direct entry into the lumen with removal of line cap. Surveillance cultures of throat and rectum were obtained to detect carriage of potential pathogens. Exogenous septicaemia was defined as a blood stream infection due to microorganisms not carried by the patient in throat and/or rectum. The incidence of exogenous septicaemia following a change of practice of not routinely using sterile gloves for accessing lines was compared to the incidence of exogenous septicaemia in a historical control group. The number of exogenous septicaemia episodes per inpatient days with gloves and without gloves was calculated for the total number of episodes and for the first episode for each child. The relative incidence and 95% confidence intervals was also calculated for first and total episodes. For both, all episodes and first episodes there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of exogenous septicaemia comparing the control and study patients. In summary, this study does not support or approve the use of sterile gloves when accessing CVCs in respect of exogenous septicaemia.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定在进入中央静脉导管(CVC)时常规使用无菌手套是否会影响儿科肿瘤患者外源性败血症的发生率。为期36个月的研究期为2000年9月至2003年8月。在此期间,暂停了使用无菌手套接触CVC的常规操作。仅当从管路中获取血液样本或注射需要直接进入管腔并移除管路盖的物质时,才使用无菌手套。获得了喉和直肠的监测培养物以检测潜在病原体的携带。外源性败血病定义为由于患者喉咙和/或直肠中未携带的微生物引起的血流感染。在历史对照组中,将不习惯使用无菌手套进行接触的做法改变后的外源性败血症发生率与外源性败血症发生率进行了比较。对于总发作次数和每个孩子的第一次发作,计算每位住院天戴着手套和不戴手套的外源性败血病发作的次数。还针对首次发作和全部发作计算了相对发生率和95%置信区间。对于所有发作和首次发作,与对照和研究患者相比,外源败血病的发生率在统计学上没有显着差异。总而言之,本研究不支持或不赞成在接触CVC时因外源性败血症使用无菌手套。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号