首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: An International Journal >In-vitro maturation of oocytes vs in-vitro fertilization with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist for women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: can superiority be defined?
【24h】

In-vitro maturation of oocytes vs in-vitro fertilization with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist for women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: can superiority be defined?

机译:多囊卵巢综合征女性卵母细胞的体外成熟与促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂的体外受精:能否确定优势?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective: Patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) are at increased risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles. Interventions to reduce the risk of OHSS in these patients include in-vitro fertilization (IVF) with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist, and retrieval of immature oocytes followed by in-vitro maturation (IVM). The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of IVM and IVF-GnRH antagonist protocols in women with PCOS undergoing assisted reproductive technology.Study design: Retrospective cohort study. Records of women with PCOS who underwent IVM or IVF-GnRH antagonist protocols between 2010 and 2011 were reviewed. In total, there were 61 IVM cycles and 53 IVF-GnRH antagonist cycles. The treatment protocols were compared in terms of the number of oocytes retrieved, dose of gonadotropin administrated, fertilization rates, quality of embryos, pregnancy, and delivery and abortion rates.Results: The number (mean ± standard deviation) of mature oocytes did not differ significantly between the two groups (7.11 ±5.7 vs 8.16 ± 5.07 for the GnRH antagonist group and the IVM group, respectively; p = 0.38). The average dose of gonadotropin (1938 IU±838 IU/cycle vs 118±199 IU/cycle; p<0.001), fertilization rate (77% vs 60%; p < 0.001) and high-quality embryo rate (58.8% vs 48.3; p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the GnRH antagonist group compared with the IVM group. Pregnancy rates (40% vs 25%; p = 0.08), livebirth rates per pregnancy (71% vs 53%; p = 0.265) and abortion rates (10% vs 27%; p = 0.17) were comparable.Conclusions: The IVM protocol can be an alternative for infertile women with PCOS who wish to prevent the potential adverse effects of gonadotropin treatment. Prospective studies are needed to compare the outcomes of these two treatment protocols.
机译:目的:在受控的卵巢过度刺激周期中,多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)患者患卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)的风险增加。在这些患者中降低OHSS风险的干预措施包括使用促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)拮抗剂进行体外受精(IVF),以及取回未成熟的卵母细胞,然后进行体外成熟(IVM)。本研究的目的是比较接受辅助生殖技术的PCOS妇女的IVM和IVF-GnRH拮抗剂方案的疗效。研究设计:回顾性队列研究。回顾了2010年至2011年间接受IVM或IVF-GnRH拮抗剂方案治疗的PCOS妇女的记录。总共有61个IVM周期和53个IVF-GnRH拮抗剂周期。比较处理方案的卵母细胞数,促性腺激素的剂量,受精率,胚胎质量,妊娠,分娩和流产率。结果:成熟卵母细胞的数量(平均值±标准差)没有差异。两组之间的差异显着(GnRH拮抗剂组和IVM组分别为7.11±5.7和8.16±5.07; p = 0.38)。促性腺激素的平均剂量(1938 IU±838 IU /周期vs 118±199 IU /周期; p <0.001),受精率(77%vs 60%; p <0.001)和高质量胚芽率(58.8%vs 48.3) ; p <0.001)在GnRH拮抗剂组中明显高于IVM组。妊娠率(40%vs 25%; p = 0.08),每次妊娠的分娩率(71%vs 53%; p = 0.265)和流产率(10%vs 27%; p = 0.17)是可比较的。对于希望防止促性腺激素治疗的潜在不良反应的PCOS不育妇女,该方案可以替代。需要进行前瞻性研究以比较这两种治疗方案的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号