...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: An International Journal >Efficacy and safety of aceclofenac and drotaverine fixed-dose combination in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhoea: a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized comparative study with aceclofenac.
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of aceclofenac and drotaverine fixed-dose combination in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhoea: a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized comparative study with aceclofenac.

机译:醋氯芬酸和屈他维林固定剂量联合用药治疗原发性痛经的有效性和安全性:一项双盲,双盲,随机对照研究与醋氯芬酸。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of aceclofenac-drotaverine combination against aceclofenac alone in patients with primary dysmenorrhoea. STUDY DESIGN: This double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, comparative, multicentric study enrolled 200 women (100 women in each arm) in the age range of 18-35 years with primary dysmenorrhoea at four centers. The patients were randomly allocated to either aceclofenac 100mg-drotaverine 80 mg b.i.d or aceclofenac 100mg alone b.i.d for a maximum of 3 days. Primary efficacy parameters were total area under pain relief (PR) score up to 4 and 8h (TOPAR/4 and TOPAR/8). Secondary efficacy measurements were pain-intensity difference (PID), sum of PID over 4 and 8h (SPID/4 and SPID/8), peak PID over 4 and 8h and peak PR over 4 and 8h, total study drug consumption, and patient's and investigator's global evaluation of the efficacy. RESULTS: Both treatments showed significant improvement in baseline values in all efficacy parameters. The combination was significantly superior to monotherapy in terms of TOPAR/4 (24.0 vs 18.54) (p=0.000) and TOPAR/8 (40.3 vs 35.2) (p=0.003), SPID/4 (-17.9 vs -13.88) (p=0.000) and SPID/8 (-31.06 vs -26.8) (p=0.001), peak PID/4 (-6.60 vs -5.75) (p=0.001) and peak PR/4 (8.26 vs 7.10) (p=0.000). At the end of 8h, both treatments were comparable with respect to peak PID/8 and peak PR/8 (p>0.05). The total number of doses consumed by patients treated with combination therapy was less than with monotherapy (150 vs 168 doses). The combination was significantly superior to monotherapy with respect to patient's and investigator's global evaluation of the efficacy (p=0.002 and p=0.001, respectively). Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: This study establishes the efficacy of aceclofenac-drotaverine combination in patients with primary dysmenorrhoea. The fixed-dose combination of aceclofenac and drotaverine should therefore be considered as a suitable, effective and well tolerated treatment option for primary dysmenorrhoea.
机译:目的:评价醋氯芬酸-屈他维林联合用药对原发性痛经患者单独使用醋氯芬酸的疗效和安全性。研究设计:这项双盲,双假人,随机,比较,多中心研究纳入了200名女性(每组100名女性),年龄在18-35岁之间,有四个中心的原发性痛经。患者被随机分配至100mg乙氯芬酸-盐酸屈伏拉汀或每天100 mg乙氯芬酸单独b.i.d,最多3天。主要功效参数是疼痛缓解(PR)评分下的总面积(最长4和8小时)(TOPAR / 4和TOPAR / 8)。次要疗效指标包括疼痛强度差(PID),4和8h以上的PID的总和(SPID / 4和SPID / 8),4和8h以上的PID的峰值,4和8h的PR峰值,研究药物的总消耗量以及患者的以及研究者对疗效的整体评估。结果:两种治疗均显示所有功效参数的基线值均有显着改善。就TOPAR / 4(24.0 vs 18.54)(p = 0.000)和TOPAR / 8(40.3 vs 35.2)(p = 0.003),SPID / 4(-17.9 vs -13.88)(p = 0.000)和SPID / 8(-31.06 vs -26.8)(p = 0.001),峰值PID / 4(-6.60 vs -5.75)(p = 0.001)和峰值PR / 4(8.26 vs 7.10)(p = 0.000 )。在8h结束时,两种治疗在峰值PID / 8和峰值PR / 8方面均具有可比性(p> 0.05)。联合疗法治疗的患者所消耗的总剂量少于单一疗法(150与168剂量)。就患者和研究者的整体疗效评估而言,该组合明显优于单一疗法(分别为p = 0.002和p​​ = 0.001)。两种治疗均耐受良好。结论:本研究建立了醋氯芬酸-屈他维林联合治疗原发性痛经的疗效。因此,应将醋氯芬酸和屈他维林的固定剂量组合视为原发性痛经的合适,有效且耐受性良好的治疗选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号