【24h】

CT colonography. Preface.

机译:CT结肠造影。前言。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is widespread consensus among gastroenterologists in the United States that conventional colonoscopy is the best screening modality for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, a large segment of the population at risk for the disease remains unscreened. Although there are many purported reasons for such underutilization fear of invasive testing is among the most commonly offered. Also contributing to the screening shortfall is the fact that there are too few endoscopists in the United States to meet current and projected needs for CRC screening by conventional colonoscopy.One of the most compelling and significant advances in CRC screening of the past decade has been the rapid evolution of computed tomography colonography (CTC). The use of CTC as a primary CRC screening exam, however, has generated controversy relating to its clinical and cost effectiveness, its potential performance as it devolves from academic centers into the community, the cost and risks associated with reporting of extracolonic lesions, the amount of training necessary to read CTC, the qualifications of gastroenterologists to read CTC, the magnitude of the associated radiation risk, and so forth.
机译:在美国肠胃病学专家中,普遍的共识是常规结肠镜检查是结直肠癌(CRC)的最佳筛查手段。但是,仍有很大一部分患这种疾病的风险尚未筛查。尽管有许多据称是这种利用不足的原因,但最常见的是对侵入式测试的恐惧。造成筛查不足的另一个原因是,美国内镜医师很少,无法满足当前和预计的常规结肠镜检查对CRC的需求。过去十年来,CRC筛查最引人注目的重大进展之一是计算机断层扫描结肠造影(CTC)的快速发展。但是,使用CTC作为主要的CRC筛查检查已引起争议,涉及其临床和成本效益,从学术中心转移到社区时的潜在表现,与结肠外病变报告相关的成本和风险,数量阅读CTC所需的培训,胃肠病医师阅读CTC的资格,相关辐射风险的大小等。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号