首页> 外文期刊>Gastrointestinal Endoscopy >Adherence to recommended intervals for surveillance colonoscopy in average-risk patients with 1 to 2 small (<1 cm) polyps on screening colonoscopy
【24h】

Adherence to recommended intervals for surveillance colonoscopy in average-risk patients with 1 to 2 small (<1 cm) polyps on screening colonoscopy

机译:在筛查结肠镜检查中平均风险为1到2个小息肉(<1 cm)息肉的平均风险患者,应遵循推荐的结肠镜检查间隔

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Among average-risk patients, repeat colonoscopy in 5 years is recommended after 1 to 2 small (<1 cm) adenomas are found on screening colonoscopy or in 10 years if hyperplastic polyps are found. However, sparse quantitative data are available about adherence to these recommendations or factors that may improve adherence. Objective To quantify adherence to recommended intervals and to identify factors associated with lack of adherence. Design Retrospective endoscopic database analysis. Setting Tertiary-care institution and Veterans Affairs Health System. Patients Average-risk individuals undergoing screening colonoscopy found to have 1 to 2 small polyps on screening colonoscopy. Main Outcome Measurements Frequency of recommending repeat colonoscopy in 5 years if 1 to 2 small adenomas are found and in 10 years if hyperplastic polyps are found. Results Of 922 outpatient screening colonoscopies with 1 to 2 small polyps found, 90.2% received appropriate recommendations for timing of repeat colonoscopy. Eighty-four percent of patients with 1 to 2 small adenomas and 94% of patients with 1 to 2 hyperplastic polyps received recommendations that were consistent with guidelines. Based on logistic regression analysis, patients aged >70 years (odds ratio [OR] 2.4, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-5.7), fair bowel preparation (OR 12.7; 95% CI, 7.3-22.4), poor bowel preparation (OR 10.0; 95% CI, 4.3-23.6), and the presence of 2 small adenomas versus 1 small adenoma (OR 3.6; 95% CI, 2.2-6.0) were factors associated with "overuse" or recommendations inconsistent with guidelines. Limitations Retrospective study design. Conclusion More than 90% of endoscopists' recommendations for timing of surveillance colonoscopy in average-risk patients with 1 to 2 small polyps are consistent with guideline recommendations. Quality of preparation is strongly associated with deviation from guideline recommendations.
机译:背景在中等风险的患者中,建议在筛查结肠镜检查发现1至2个小(<1 cm)腺瘤后或5年(如果发现增生性息肉)后再行5年结肠镜检查。但是,关于遵守这些建议或可能会改善遵守情况的因素,尚缺乏定量数据。目的量化对推荐间隔的依从性,并确定与缺乏依从性相关的因素。设计回顾性内窥镜数据库分析。建立三级护理机构和退伍军人事务卫生系统。患者接受结肠镜检查的平均风险个体在结肠镜检查中发现1至2个小息肉。主要结果测量如果发现1至2个小腺瘤,建议在5年内重复进行结肠镜检查的频率,如果发现增生性息肉,则建议在10年内重复进行结肠镜检查的频率。结果在922例门诊筛查结肠镜检查中发现了1至2个小息肉,其中90.2%接受了适当的重复结肠镜检查时间建议。 1-4例小腺瘤患者中的84%和1-2例增生性息肉患者中94%的患者接受了与指南一致的建议。根据Logistic回归分析,年龄> 70岁的患者(赔率[OR] 2.4,95%置信区间[CI],1.0-5.7),肠道准备良好(OR 12.7; 95%CI,7.3-22.4),肠通畅预备(OR 10.0; 95%CI,4.3-23.6)以及2个小腺瘤与1个小腺瘤(OR 3.6; 95%CI,2.2-6.0)的存在是与“过度使用”或与指南不符的相关因素。局限性回顾性研究设计。结论超过90%的内镜医师对1至2个小息肉的高危患者进行结肠镜检查的时机建议与指南建议相符。准备质量与偏离指南的建议密切相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号