首页> 外文期刊>Gastrointestinal Endoscopy >Effective bowel cleansing before colonoscopy: a randomized study of split-dosage versus non-split dosage regimens of high-volume versus low-volume polyethylene glycol solutions.
【24h】

Effective bowel cleansing before colonoscopy: a randomized study of split-dosage versus non-split dosage regimens of high-volume versus low-volume polyethylene glycol solutions.

机译:结肠镜检查前有效的肠道清洁:一项关于大剂量和小剂量聚乙二醇溶液的分剂量和非分剂量方案的随机研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Adequate bowel cleansing is essential for a high-quality, effective, and safe colonoscopy. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the degree of colon cleansing comparing split-dosage versus non-split-dosage intake of two different polyethylene glycol (PEG) volumes (low-volume PEG + ascorbic acid vs standard-volume PEG-electrolyte solution) and to identify predictors of poor bowel cleansing. DESIGN: Single-blind, active control, randomized study. SETTING: Tertiary-care institutions in Italy. PATIENTS: This study involved adult patients undergoing elective colonoscopy. INTERVENTION: Colonoscopy with different bowel preparation methods. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Degree of bowel cleansing. RESULTS: We randomized 895 patients, and 868 patients were finally included in intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Overall compliance was excellent (97%) for both preparation methods. No difference in tolerability was recorded. Palatability was superior with low volume compared with high volume (acceptable or good 58% vs 51%, respectively, P < .005), independently of intake schedule. PEG plus ascorbic acid produced the same degree of cleansing as standard-volume PEG-electrolyte solution (77% vs 73.4%, respectively, within the split-dosage group and 41.7% vs 44.3%, respectively, within the non-split-dosage group). Independently of PEG volumes, the split-dosage regimen produced markedly superior cleansing results over the same-day method (good/excellent 327/435, 75.2% vs 186/433, 43.0%, P = .00001). Maximum cleansing was observed in colonoscopies performed within 8 hours from the last fluid intake versus over 8 hours from the last fluid intake (P < .001). The degree of bowel cleansing affected both cecal intubation (failed intubation 11.7% with fair/poor preparation vs 1.2% with good/excellent preparation, P = .00001) and polyp detection rates (12.2% with fair/poor vs 24.6% with good/excellent preparation, P = .001). Aborted procedures were significantly more frequent in the non-split-dosage arm (21.2% vs 6.9%, odds ratio [OR] 3.60 [2.29-5.77], P < .0001). Independent predictors of poor bowel cleansing were male sex (OR 1.45 [1.08-1.96], P = .014) and a non-split-dosage bowel preparation schedule (OR 2.08 [1.89-2.37], P = .0001). CONCLUSION: Low-volume PEG plus ascorbic acid is as effective as high-volume PEG-electrolyte solution but has superior palatability. A split-dosage schedule is the most effective bowel cleansing method. Colonoscopy should be performed within 8 hours of the last fluid intake.
机译:背景:充分的肠道清洁对于高质量,有效和安全的结肠镜检查至关重要。目的:通过比较两种不同聚乙二醇(PEG)体积(小体积PEG +抗坏血酸与标准体积PEG电解质溶液)的分剂量和非分剂量摄入量,评估结肠清洗的程度,并确定预测因素肠清洁不良。设计:单盲,主动控制,随机研究。地点:意大利的三级医疗机构。患者:本研究涉及接受择期结肠镜检查的成年患者。干预:结肠镜检查采用不同的肠准备方法。主要观察指标:肠道清洁程度。结果:我们将895例患者随机分组,最终将868例患者纳入意向性治疗(ITT)分析。两种制备方法的总体依从性均极佳(97%)。耐受性无差异。与高摄入量相比,低摄入量与适量相比具有更好的可口性(可接受的或良好的58%比51%分别为P <.005),而不依赖于摄入时间表。 PEG加抗坏血酸产生的清洁度与标准体积PEG电解质溶液相同(分剂量组分别为77%对73.4%,非分剂量组分别为41.7%对44.3% )。与PEG量无关,分剂量方案产生的清洗效果明显优于当日方法(良好/优良327 / 435,75.2%与186 / 433,43.0%,P = .00001)。在最后一次进水后8小时内进行结肠镜检查的清洗效果最佳,而从最后一次进水后8小时内进行结肠镜检查的清洗效果最高(P <.001)。肠的清洗程度对盲肠插管(盲肠插管不成功11.7%,普通/不良准备相对于1.2%,良好/优良准备,P = .00001)和息肉检出率(息肉检出率(普通/较差为12.2%,良好/不良比24.6%)有影响。出色的准备工作,P = 0.001)。在非分流剂量组中,中止手术的发生率明显更高(21.2%vs 6.9%,优势比[OR] 3.60 [2.29-5.77],P <.0001)。肠清洁不良的独立预测因素是男性(OR 1.45 [1.08-1.96],P = .014)和非分剂量肠道准备时间表(OR 2.08 [1.89-2.37],P = .0001)。结论:小体积PEG加抗坏血酸与大体积PEG电解质溶液一样有效,但具有出色的适口性。分剂量计划是最有效的肠清洁方法。结肠镜检查应在最后一次进水后8小时内进行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号