首页> 外文期刊>Gastrointestinal Endoscopy >The outcome of a second preparation for colonoscopy after preparation failure in the first procedure
【24h】

The outcome of a second preparation for colonoscopy after preparation failure in the first procedure

机译:在第一个步骤中准备失败后,第二次结肠镜检查准备的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: There are scant data regarding the outcome of consecutive repeated procedures in patients who failed to adequately clean their colon for colonoscopy.Objective: To investigate the outcome of a second colonoscopy after preparation-associated failure of the first colonoscopy.Design and Setting: A retrospective study in a tertiary-referral center.Patients: All patients with failure of colonoscopy because of poor preparation within a 1-year period. .Results: Of a total of 6990 colonoscopies performed during the study period, 307 procedures (4.4%) failed because of inadequate preparation. Data on subsequent repeated colonoscopies were available for 235 patients. The repeated procedure again failed because of unsatisfactory preparation in 54 of these patients (23%). The failure rate in subsequent third and fourth colonoscopies was also high (more than 25%). Of the various patient and procedure-related parameters examined, only the use of calcium channel blockers (CCB) was found to be predictive ofa failed repeated preparation (odds ratio [OR] 3.2 [95% CI, 1.6-6.3], P < .001). In contrast, a next-day colonoscopy after failure of the index procedure was associated with a reduced risk of unsatisfactory second preparation (OR 0.31 [95% CI, 0.1-0.92], P = .03).Limitations: Validated data on the specific bowel purgatives used were not available.Conclusions: Almost a fourth of patients with an unacceptable colonic preparation will also fail the repeated colonoscopy, and patients who use CCB are at particular risk for failure. Strategies to manage this difrlcuit-to-treat patient group should be investigated and may possibly include a preference for next-day colonoscopy.
机译:背景:缺乏足够的结肠镜检查清洁结肠的患者连续重复手术的结果的数据很少。目的:研究在准备相关的第一次结肠镜检查失败后第二次结肠镜检查的结果设计和设置:A患者:所有在1年内因准备不足而导致结肠镜检查失败的患者。结果:在研究期间共进行了6990例结肠镜检查,其中307例手术(占4.4%)由于准备不足而失败。随后有235例患者接受了重复结肠镜检查的数据。由于其中54位患者(23%)的准备工作不理想,因此重复操作再次失败。随后的第三和第四次结肠镜检查的失败率也很高(超过25%)。在检查的与患者和手术相关的各种参数中,仅钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)的使用可预测重复制备失败(赔率[OR] 3.2 [95%CI,1.6-6.3],P <。 001)。相比之下,索引程序失败后的第二天结肠镜检查与第二次准备不满意的风险降低有关(OR 0.31 [95%CI,0.1-0.92],P = .03)。结论:将近四分之一的结肠准备不可接受的患者也将无法通过重复结肠镜检查而失败,并且使用CCB的患者特别有失败的风险。应该研究管理这种从零开始治疗的患者的策略,并且可能包括偏爱第二天的结肠镜检查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号