首页> 外文期刊>Gastrointestinal Endoscopy >Simulator training improves practical skills in therapeutic GI endoscopy: results from a randomized, blinded, controlled study.
【24h】

Simulator training improves practical skills in therapeutic GI endoscopy: results from a randomized, blinded, controlled study.

机译:模拟器培训可提高胃肠道内窥镜检查的实用技能:一项随机,盲目的对照研究的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic endoscopic procedures are technically challenging and have higher complication rates than diagnostic procedures. Less-experienced practitioners are significantly more likely to have a complication, yet there is very limited evidence of the efficacy of training in such procedures. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of knowledge-based teaching and hands-on, simulation-based skills training in 4 therapeutic endoscopic procedures: control of nonvariceal upper GI bleeding, polypectomy, stricture dilation, and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube insertion. DESIGN: Single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Nationally accredited therapeutic endoscopy course. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTION: Participants were randomized into groups to assess the effect of knowledge-based teaching and into subjects or controls to assess skills-based training. All delegates had an initial knowledge and skills assessment by blinded experts. Subjects received one-half day of hands-on skills training, whereas the controls did not. All delegates were retested on their procedural skills. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Knowledge was assessed by using a multiple-choice questionnaire. Practical skills were assessed using station-specific checklists and a global score. RESULTS: Twenty-eight participants were randomized. There was no significant effect of knowledge-based teaching on the participants' practical skills or initial multiple-choice questionnaire score, although there was a trend toward improvement. There was a significant improvement in the subjects compared with the controls in the performance of polypectomy, control of upper GI bleeding, and esophageal dilation. There were no significant differences for PEG tube insertion. LIMITATIONS: The 2-person nature of PEG tube insertion may have resulted in performance improvement despite a lack of training. CONCLUSION: Hands-on skills training significantly improved performance in 3 therapeutic modalities. Knowledge-based teaching alone did not have a measurable effect. These results strongly support the benefit of intensive hands-on, simulation-based courses for endoscopic skills training.
机译:背景:治疗性内窥镜手术在技术上具有挑战性,并且比诊断程序具有更高的并发症发生率。经验不足的从业者更有可能出现并发症,但是,在这种过程中进行培训的功效的证据非常有限。目的:评估基于知识的教学和动手,基于模拟的技能培训在4种治疗性内窥镜手术中的效果:控制非静脉曲张上消化道出血,息肉切除术,狭窄扩张术和经皮内镜下胃造瘘术(PEG)插管。设计:单盲,随机,对照试验。地点:国家认可的治疗性内窥镜课程。参与者和干预:参与者被随机分为两组,以评估基于知识的教学的效果;被分为主题或对照,以评估基于技能的培训。所有代表均由盲人专家进行了初步的知识和技能评估。受试者接受了半天的动手技能培训,而对照组则没有。所有代表都经过了程序技能的重新测试。主要观察指标:使用多项选择问卷对知识进行评估。使用特定于站点的清单和整体评分来评估实践技能。结果:28名参与者被随机分组​​。尽管有提高的趋势,但以知识为基础的教学对参与者的实践技能或初始多项选择问卷得分没有显着影响。与对照组相比,息肉切除术的性能,上消化道出血的控制和食管扩张的效果显着改善。 PEG管插入没有显着差异。局限性:尽管缺乏培训,但PEG管插入的2人性质可能导致性能改善。结论:动手技能培训显着提高了3种治疗方式的性能。仅基于知识的教学并没有可衡量的效果。这些结果有力地支持了深入的,基于模拟的内窥镜技能培训课程的收益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号