首页> 外文期刊>Gastrointestinal Endoscopy >Impact of a novel water method on scheduled unsedated colonoscopy in U.S. veterans
【24h】

Impact of a novel water method on scheduled unsedated colonoscopy in U.S. veterans

机译:新型水处理方法对美国退伍军人计划的非镇静结肠镜检查的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Intermittent warm-water infusion in lieu of air insufflation permitted 52% of patients who accepted sedation on demand to complete colonoscopy without sedation.Objective: To test the hypothesis that the water method enhances cecal intubation and increases the proportion of patients who report willingness to repeat a scheduled unsedated colonoscopy.Design: Observational study.Patients: Two consecutive groups of veterans.Interventions: From June 2005 to May 2006, the usual air insufflation method was used to aid coionoscope insertion. From June 2006 to October 2007, the water method was used.Main Outcome Measurements: Cecal intubation; report of willingness to repeat unsedated colonoscopy.Results: Sixty-two and 63 veterans were examined by the air method and the water method, respectively. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed that the cecal intubation rate with the water method (97% [61/63]) was significantly higher than that with the air method (76% [47/62]). The proportion of patients who reported willingness to repeat unsedated colonoscopy was significantly higher with the water method (90% [57/63]) compared with the air method (69% [43/62]).Limitations: Single site, nonrandomized, unblinded, small number of elderly male veterans.Conclusion: The effects of the water method in the group for scheduled unsedated colonoscopy were sufficiently provocative to warrant calling for their confirmation by a randomized controlled trial.
机译:背景:间歇性温水输注代替空气吹入允许接受镇静的患者中有52%的患者在不进行镇静的情况下完成结肠镜检查。目的:验证以下假设:水方法可增强盲肠插管并增加报告意愿的患者比例重复进行有计划的非镇静性结肠镜检查。设计:观察性研究。患者:连续两批退伍军人。干预措施:从2005年6月到2006年5月,使用了普通的空气吹入法来辅助Coionoscope的插入。从2006年6月至2007年10月,采用水法。结果:用空气法和水法分别检查了62名和63名退伍军人。意图治疗分析显示,水法盲肠插管率(97%[61/63])显着高于空气法盲肠插管率(76%[47/62])。报道愿意重复未镇静的结肠镜检查的患者比例,用水法(90%[57/63])明显高于空气法(69%[43/62])。局限性:单部位,非随机,无盲区结论:定期进行非镇静性结肠镜检查的组中,水法的效果足以引起争议,需要通过随机对照试验予以证实。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号