首页> 外文期刊>Gastrointestinal Endoscopy >Endoscopic versus surgical therapy for early cancer in Barrett's esophagus: a decision analysis.
【24h】

Endoscopic versus surgical therapy for early cancer in Barrett's esophagus: a decision analysis.

机译:内窥镜与手术治疗早期Barrett食道癌的关系:一项决策分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy for early esophageal adenocarcinoma is associated with increased operative mortality and morbidity, but possibly a decreased recurrence rate compared with endoscopic therapy when using EMR and radiofrequency ablation. OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost-effectiveness of esophagectomy and endoscopic therapy in the treatment of early esophageal adenocarcinoma. DESIGN: Decision analysis model. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. RESULTS: During the 5-year study period, endoscopic therapy cost Dollars 17,000.00 and yielded 4.88 quality-adjusted life years, compared with Dollars 28,000.00 and 4.59, respectively, for esophagectomy. Varying the recurrence rates of cancer or Barrett's esophagus metaplasia after endoscopic therapy did not change the overall outcome. The sensitivity analysis demonstrated, however, that the outcome depended on the rate of lymph node involvement and operative mortality. Under the best of circumstances in favor of esophagectomy, such as 2% operative mortality, no reduced quality of life after esophagectomy, and a low 5-year survival rate after recurrence of endoscopic ablation, the risk of positive lymph nodes still needed to exceed 25% before esophagectomy became the preferred treatment option. This threshold is twice as high as the values reported for early submucosal cancer invasion. LIMITATIONS: Limited data are available about the long-term outcome of EMR and radiofrequency ablation. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic therapy for early Barrett's esophagus adenocarcinoma is more effective and less expensive than esophagectomy. Even in early esophageal adenocarcinoma with submucosal invasion, endoscopic therapy is a cost-effective alternative to esophagectomy, especially in patients with a high operative risk.
机译:背景:早期食管腺癌的食管切除术与手术死亡率和发病率增加相关,但与使用EMR和射频消融术的内镜治疗相比,复发率可能降低。目的:比较食管切除术和内镜治疗在早期食管腺癌中的成本效益。设计:决策分析模型。主要观察指标:成本效益比增加。结果:在为期5年的研究期内,内镜治疗的费用为17,000.00美元,质量调整后的生命年为4.88美元,而食管切除术的费用分别为28,000.00美元和4.59美元。内镜治疗后改变癌症或巴雷特食管上皮化生的复发率不会改变总体预后。敏感性分析表明,结果取决于淋巴结受累率和手术死亡率。在支持食管切除术的最佳情况下,例如手术死亡率为2%,食管切除术后生活质量没有降低,内镜消融术后复发的5年生存率较低,阳性淋巴结转移的风险仍需超过25食管切除术成为首选治​​疗方案之前的百分比。该阈值是早期粘膜下癌浸润报道值的两倍。局限性:有关EMR和射频消融的长期结果的有限数据。结论:内镜治疗早期Barrett食道腺癌比食管切除术更有效,更便宜。即使在早期食管腺癌伴粘膜下浸润,内镜治疗也是食管切除术的一种经济有效的替代方法,特别是在手术风险较高的患者中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号