首页> 外文期刊>Eye >Epidemiology of diabetic retinopathy and macular oedema: a systematic review.
【24h】

Epidemiology of diabetic retinopathy and macular oedema: a systematic review.

机译:糖尿病视网膜病变和黄斑水肿的流行病学:系统评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

AIMS: To systematically review the literature on the prevalence and incidence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and macular oedema (MO). METHODS: A search of the bibliographic databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL) was conducted up to October 2001. Selected relevant studies were scrutinized and included in the review. RESULTS: A total of 359 studies were included. The studies were reported in nearly 100 different journals and in over 50 countries. The majority of the studies were US-based, with large studies such as the Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy dominating the literature. The studies were quite dated and highly heterogeneous in nature in terms of patient selection with variable inclusion criteria (age range, gender, diabetes duration and type, ethnicity, comorbidity, and DR status, assessment, and classification). CONCLUSIONS: There are inconsistencies between epidemiological studies, and differences in study methods may contribute to conflicting reports of prevalence and incidence of DR and MO in diabetic populations. As new therapies for DR and its associated complications emerge, the need to capture and monitor new epidemiological data becomes increasingly important to be able to assess the impact and effectiveness of these therapies. Robust, longitudinal capture of patient data is, therefore, essential to evaluate the impact of current practice on the epidemiology of diabetic eye complications.
机译:目的:系统地回顾有关糖尿病性视网膜病变(DR)和黄斑水肿(MO)的患病率和发病率的文献。方法:直到2001年10月,对书目数据库(Medline,Embase,CINAHL)进行了搜索。对相关研究进行了仔细审查,并将其纳入本综述。结果:总共包括359项研究。这项研究在50多个国家的近100种不同期刊上进行了报道。大多数研究以美国为基础,而大型研究(如《糖尿病视网膜病变的威斯康星州流行病学研究》)主导了文献。就患者选择而言,这些研究是过时的,并且本质上是高度异类的,包括可变的纳入标准(年龄范围,性别,糖尿病病程和类型,种族,合并症,DR状态,评估和分类)。结论:流行病学研究之间存在不一致之处,研究方法的差异可能导致糖尿病人群中DR和MO的患病率和发生率相互矛盾的报道。随着用于DR及其相关并发症的新疗法的出现,捕获和监视新的流行病学数据的需求变得越来越重要,以便能够评估这些疗法的影响和有效性。因此,对患者数据进行可靠的纵向捕获对于评估当前实践对糖尿病眼并发症流行病学的影响至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号